Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worth David

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of 04:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Worth David (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed for no discernible (or stated) reason. Nothing here to suggest notability. TheLongTone (talk) 14:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Was a notable figure in a period of change to the college admissions system at a notable university. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyungjoo98 (talkcontribs) 15:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Administrative position not high enough for automatic notability through WP:PROF (he was not head of an entire university) so to be notable he needs to pass WP:GNG, which requires multiple reliably-published sources, independent of him, that provide significant coverage of him. But that's not what we have; instead, we have stories that mention him only in passing or that quote him rather than covering him. And the claim that he was a leader in changes to college admissions, rather than merely being an administrator during those changes, are only very weakly supported by the sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.