Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-ray dark planet
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Non-admin procedural close. Article was Deleted by Timotheus Canens per ANI discussion.. Trusilver 07:30, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- X-ray dark planet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nonsense article, possibly with OR. Individual sentences can be parsed as English, but taken together, the article is gibberish - it doesn't address the page's topic! I do not think there is something called an X-ray Dark Planet. References are only here for padding, it looks like. Editor who created this page, User:Marshallsumter is currently banned for disruptive editing. Hundreds of other articles from this editor are being canvassed. Please help! AstroCog (talk) 20:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Looks to be a filler article. Can't find anything on the subject JguyTalkDone 21:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, looking at a few things, bits and pieces of this article have been taken and plagurised from different places. See: http://flat-panel.sure-review.com/news/X-ray-dark-planet.html which matches the first part of this article perfectly. I think this may fall under speedy. Time to do some digging into his other articles to see if they are the same! JguyTalkDone 21:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as copyvio through WP:CWW (like so many articles from this editor). The url noted by Jguy is not a problem, since it's taken from Wikipedia, although the creator does have a copyvio track record. Also bizarre WP:SYNTH, and irrelevancies like solar X-rays (the sun is not a dark planet). -- 202.124.74.73 (talk) 02:25, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.