Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yiannis Melanitis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yiannis Melanitis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. No independent sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article creator appears to have requested its deletion as well. VQuakr (talk) 16:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He does not appear to meet any of the criteria at WP:ARTIST. Even though he is a "collaborator" at the Athens School of Fine Arts, he is not an instructor, much less a professor. --Bejnar (talk) 17:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for four reasons. (i). I have noted at least one major exhibition of his work. (ii). He was interviewed by the Kathimerini newspaper and a lengthy article published about his exhibition. The interview was by a notable journalist of that newspaper and that indicates notability (at the very least a worthwhile acknowledgement by a notable journalist from a notable newspaper). (iii). When you search for him on Greek Google he is not invisible. He is a notable multi-disciplined artist who appears to be very talented in sculpture and music. (iv). He has exhibited outside his home country. Have tagged the article for rescue. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 21:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong ^chatter 04:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:ARTIST. SnottyWong ^chatter 04:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no indication that topic meets WP:CREATIVE, WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 17:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The Greek language Kathimerini newspaper article easily meets WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 21:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think that I have done enough work on the article to turn your votes around. Could you take another look. Many thanks. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 22:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I did some work and added a few more citations and, yes, it is a Keeper. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 03:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 10:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The media coverage in the Kathimerini newspaper article, as well as the other sources added by Nipsonanomhmata (talk · contribs) and Dr.K. (talk · contribs), confirm that Yiannis Melanitis is notable per WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. I thank you two for saving this article from deletion. Cunard (talk) 10:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much Cunard for your kind comments. It was a very nice gesture on your part and it is really appreciated. Take care. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 16:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kathimerini counts as a reliable source. If those who read Greek say he gets coverage in Greek sources, so be it. Dream Focus 17:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Dream Focus. I will translate the in-cite quotations soon for better ease of reference. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 20:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep !vote changed, adequate sources to meet WP:GNG. VQuakr (talk) 06:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.