Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yohei Azakami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Doesn't seem to be a clear indication that he meets GNG, but there has been an offer to develop it in draftspace. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yohei Azakami

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed under NPP / new article curation. No indication of wp:notability. Zero wp:gng type sources in the article or findable in my search. Of the filmography works listed, ~2/3 of wp articles had no mention of him whatsoevrer, and the other ~1/3 had a brief mention/listing of him. North8000 (talk) 03:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He passes WP:GNG on Japanese articles and even has a profile on Oricon. Searching up his Japanese name brings up mentions from articles published by Animate Times, Kadokawa, and 4Gamer. I would also vouch for the article to be moved to drafts if sourcing is an issue. lullabying (talk) 09:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lullabying: Thanks for the offer to take this over as a draft. Meeting GNG means in-depth coverage by independent sources. If you meant that literally (i.e. already know of such coverage), why not add 1 or 2 of such sources right now? Two would make this a certain keep, and one might do it. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 10:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify per above. The material presented doesn't clearly show that the findings are more than passing mentions, but I'd WP:AGF that using the sources in draftspace will better convey the notability later. -2pou (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per above. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 13:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.