Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young-Tae Chang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. Non-admin closure. Error in searching name for sources. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 23:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Young-Tae Chang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PROF jsfouche ☽☾Talk 12:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question Have you checked the citation record of his papers? That's what would, or would not, establish him as an authority in his field. DGG ( talk ) 17:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have and find a GS h index of 29, a clear pass of WP:Prof#C1 in chemistry. Would the nominator care to explain why he ignored this feature? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:49, 31 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Comment I evidently typed the wrong name when trying to check. It was not ignored, but rather a careless typo. Once I clicked the link in the AfD intro above (rather than a manual search), I clearly see this passes WP:Prof#C1. Will close as speedy keep. Thank you for alerting me to this. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 23:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.