Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yunmai Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 03:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yunmai Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Classic A7. Has been created and speedied at least once before already. Created in the first person as spam (still has the sentence "we also provide..."). Only sources are primary, i.e. the subject's own website. The other "sources" are only describing OCR technology and don't establish notability for the company. Thought about speedy again but since some work has been attempted, a discussion might find a more powerful consensus. Recommend salting as well if deleted. William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 12:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as nom.--William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 12:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 12:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 12:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It is pure WP:SPAM and was created by a person who was paid by the company to create the article (they have now created it several times so far) as described on their user page. The article does nothing but promote what seems to be a non-notable company. Support salting to prevent the continuous recreation. - Ahunt (talk) 14:56, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A promotional article on a firm going about its business, but searches are returning no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 18:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and even SNOW delete perhaps as this seems quite clear and my searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and block Judy Wangw for violating paid editing policies, but do not SALT this article as this topic could become notable at a later stage. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 14:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.