Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvonne Bajela

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:22, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yvonne Bajela

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Businessperson doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete References are profiles and intervies. 4 Forbes refs, 2 by contributor, 1 is a profile, 1 is Forbes under 30 which are Non-RS. 2 is an interview, primary, one is a routine annoucement of being employed, one is a company ref, 1 is a another profile, and the last one is waste of time. Most either primary as interviews, Non-rs forbes refs or profiles written the Bajela. No really significant coverage outside the business. There is a Guardian article but is the business. Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 08:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I have nothing to add to Scope creep's explanation of why the currently-cited sources aren't adequate, and my search didn't succeed in finding any others that would move the needle in terms of the WP:GNG. Too soon, perhaps. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:30, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.