Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvonne Coomber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yvonne Coomber

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently not notable by our standards, does not meet WP:ARTIST, some shows in some fairly minor galleries, the routine business of a working artist. Sourcing is tenuous in the extreme. I started removed some of the worst (e.g., Houzz: "With Houzz, professionals can showcase their work and provide insight into their values") but stopped when I realised that there's essentially nothing there. Article creator is blocked as an undisclosed paid editor, and there seems to be every likelihood that this is in fact a paid advertisement (and, lest we forget, Wikipedia does not tolerate advertisements). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.Looks like a cv or promotion. The article is tagged with paid, it is hard to tell how it came about but it certainly doesn't appear an organic article. 30+ refs, I checked about half a dozen at random and they mean nothing, the others look the same but weren't checked. Szzuk (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete went through all the sources, and also did a search for other sources. There were articles that talk about her, but they took forever to find and were blogs. Doesn't meet WP:ARTIST. SportingFlyer (talk) 03:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sourcing is not strong enough to support notability, and is of very low quality.104.163.148.25 (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.