Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 January 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 19 January 21 >

January 20

[edit]

Category:J-Rock artists

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete the category as duplication. There is no current list of J-Rock groups so I will move the category page to List of Japanese rock music groups as nominated. I am not sure why the old List of Japanese rock bands was merged to List of musical artists from Japan so I will update that old redirect to point to the recreated list; it has incoming links, so at least the recreated page won't be an orphan. – Fayenatic London 00:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Convert Category:J-Rock artists to article List of Japanese rock music groups
Nominator's rationale: Was originally created as a list article, moved today into a category. As a category it is redundant with Category:Japanese rock music groups and Category:Japanese rock musicians and their subcategories. Xfansd (talk) 22:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either:
    • Keep the category, or
    • Delete the category.
Either way, if there is a Category:Japanese rock music groups then the category both in category form and article form is completely superfluous and shouldn't have an article dedicated to it if a category already exists, in which case deleting the category would be the best option.
DrStrauss talk 22:31, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fascist politics in Romania

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 08:22, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per other categories in Category:Fascism by country. Charles Essie (talk) 20:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cambodian nationalism

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relisted at CFD 2017 February 5. . --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D per Khmer nationalism. Charles Essie (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Attacks on civilians attributed to the Eelam People's Democratic Party

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 08:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Charles Essie (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fan films based on Star Wars

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Same title. The difference between the titles is irrelevant from the software's prospective; the displayed title was caused by a faulty {{DISPLAYTITLE}} on the page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Clearly an honest mistake. Charles Essie (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Underworld (films)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 08:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D per Underworld (film series). Charles Essie (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chechen wars

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) feminist 02:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D per Chechen–Russian conflict. Charles Essie (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Troubles (Northern Ireland)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. – Fayenatic London 17:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D per The Troubles. Charles Essie (talk) 17:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is time for you to give up on a lost cause and do something else at Wikipedia and stop pinging me! IQ125 (talk) 16:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Alright! Alright! I'll never ping you again. Charles Essie (talk) 00:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IQ125 speaks for me too. Oculi (talk) 01:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Charles Essie (talk) 01:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I still say that this needs a disambiguator. Until the 1970s, "The Troubles" was a euphemism for the events leading up to the creation of the Irish Free State. Even that acquired a different disambiguator, I suspect we would still risk the categories picking up irrelevant articles. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chalcedonianism

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_11#Category:Chalcedonianism. – Fayenatic London 17:22, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete because the scope of the category is unclear (is it about denominations, or rites, or theology?) and without limiting inclusion criteria the category may grow to a near-copy of the whole Category:Christianity tree (which would be useless of course). (Background: Chalcedonian Christianity may be regarded as synonymous of 'mainstream Christianity', covering Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy and Protestantism.) Marcocapelle (talk) 15:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American horror film actors

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. VegaDark (talk) 03:03, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: First, this is no scheme for Category:Horror film actors, nor should there be. Should actors be categorized by the genre of films they appear in? Doris Day in Category:American romantic-comedy film actors, for example. And just think of the overcategorization this could lead to. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 08:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Frogs of Brazil

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Frogs don't recognize national borders, so we don't need by-country categories for them. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Synclavier songs

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) feminist 05:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary category, if we continue to create categories for programming like this, it is a case of WP:OVERCAT. —IB [ Poke ] 03:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_20&oldid=1140524672"