Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 September 21
Appearance
September 21
[edit]Category:Marquess stubs
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: upmerge to Category:Marquess stubs and the respective "Peerage of [X] stubs" category. -- Black Falcon (talk) 03:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Propose deleting Category:Peerage of England marquess stubs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Propose deleting Category:Peerage of Great Britain marquess stubs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Propose deleting Category:Peerage of Ireland marquess stubs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Propose deleting Category:Peerage of the United Kingdom marquess stubs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Propose deleting Category:Peerage of England marquess stubs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Collectively, these four categories hold enough articles to fill a single stub category. Individually, each is well undersized. Propose deleting all four categories. Double-upmerge templates to Category:Marquess stubs and the respective "Peerage of..." category. Dawynn (talk) 18:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to Category:Marquess stubs. There is not enough content for the split. The two I looked at seemed to be rather more than stubs anyway. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cambodian cultural organisations
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. -- Black Falcon (talk) 02:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Duplicate categories Tim! (talk) 17:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support, while in theory Category:Cambodian cultural organisations could also refer to expatriate Cambodian cultural organisations, in practice it doesn't, because there is only Category:Cultural festivals in Cambodia in it. So in its current state the nominated category is redundant. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Westfield Warringah Mall
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Westfield Group. -- Black Falcon (talk) 02:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merge now Category:Westfield Warringah Mall
- Please merge now already existing one with two images on commons. BugMenn talk) 05:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge To Category:Westfield Group for now. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to Category:Westfield Group per WP:SMALLCAT and WP:NARROWCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedians interested in Ranch Style Brand Beans
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: This user category is populated by {{User:Mike409/RSBB}} and groups users on the basis of liking a particular brand of beans. As such, it is not a legitimate "interest" category but rather overcategorization on the basis of an irrelevant preference (and a very narrow one at that) that does not provide a basis for collaboration to improve the encyclopedia. It should go without saying, but simply liking a food does not imply an interest in collaborating on articles related to it. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Violates WP:USERCAT. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.