Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Fabales

Fabales

Nominated on 03:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC); needs 12 votes by May 1, 2006.

I know little about plants, and don't have much interest in them. But when 300 Wikipedia pages link to the Fabales stub, I do know that there's a problem. (It's currently # 73 on the list of most wanted stubs, and should be higher than that, since many of the higher-ranked entries are no longer stubs.) I don't feel that its Wikispecies entry[1] is sufficient to make up for it, especially since many more people use Wikipedia than Wikispecies.

Support:

1. Scottwiki 03:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
2. Silence 04:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
3. --HolyRomanEmperor 17:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
4. User: YankeeDoodle14
5. Davodd 02:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
6. RexNL 10:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
7. --EncycloPetey 09:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
8. Curtis Clark 16:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
9. Thefourdotelipsis 00:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
10. CrnaGora 02:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• I actually ran into this article, completely at random, about an hour ago, while visiting a few articles on legumes and cereals for WP:VA. It's definitely underdeveloped considering its linkage (even though almost all of those links are from taxonomical boxes). -Silence 04:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• The 9th vote came 26 minutes late. Should the nomination be removed? Though I made the nomination in the first place, my view is to remove it, since I know of no reason here to ignore the deadline of April 24, 2006. -Scottwiki 03:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree. But this was 4 days ago. No one will remove it? --Francisco Valverde 15:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

I do not undertand! First the deadline ended the 24th April, and it did not reach enough votes, (see above). Then no one removed it, and now it has a new deadline of the 1st of May. Could someone explain??? --Francisco Valverde 17:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

---