Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 May 26

26 May 2009

S. Darko (history · last edit) from [1]. There are probably more, but I haven't checked. Not a total copyvio, just a few sentences here and there. Drew Smith What I've done 10:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there material beyond the two quotes from the WaPo review, the use of which is fine, that is problematic? 68.248.233.93 (talk) 17:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Y Tagger removed the tag, so I presume is satisfied with this material. The section in question currently contains primarily quotes, but not enough to violation WP:NFC. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Combinatorial library (history · last edit) from http://www.netsci.org/Science/Combichem/feature02.html (and possibly several other sources). The Anome (talk) 10:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Author`s answer: Several sentences within the article were quoted from the free online article entitled: "Combinatorial Chemistry: A Strategy for the Future", source: http://www.netsci.org/Science/Combichem/feature02.html. However, the authors of "Combinatorial Chemistry: A Strategy for the Future" also NOTICE: "This article contains material which originally appeared in the March 1995 issue of the Molecular Connection". Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Combinatorial_library" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informagenesis (talk • contribs) 11:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you intend to revise the article in temporary space to remove this duplicated text? The matter will not come ripe for administrator closure for 7+1 days, so you have opportunity to do so. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Author's answer: Sure, I'm able to modify the text in accordance to your comments and will resubmit the manuscript soon. In addition, all the figures (Fig. 1-4) embedded within the text are quite unique and don't need any licencing or permission! Thanks you for your assistance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informagenesis (talk • contribs) 07:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 May 29. This contributor wrote more on this matter there. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Temp version continues to display copyrighted text from at least [2] ("This technique was pioneered by Furka and has been enthusiastically exploited by many others since its first disclosure.", etc.) I have deleted the main article and moved the temp for a short time to User:Informagenesis/Combinatorial library for further development. I have not closely compared it with other sources to be sure that those have been fully revised. I will consolidate this to be sure that we do not keep this temp version around too long without addressing copyright concerns. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gilbert Toppin (history · last edit) from http://www.semta.org.uk/about_us/semtas_board/gilbert_toppin.aspx. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kansas v. Colorado from duke law 137.22.33.46 (talk) 19:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tag was removed; not sure why, since there was no edit summary. Have not yet been able to verify that the material is PD. Have requested feedback at the project and from the tag-removing contributor. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Y Feedback from the project suggests copyvio template was appropriate; material has been removed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Corrado (2009 film) (history · last edit) from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1193473/plotsummary. • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NCIDQ (history · last edit) from http://www.ncidq.org/exam/examinfo.htm. --Bejnar (talk) 22:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First Baptist Church Memphis (history · last edit) from [3]. Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dow Jones EURO STOXX 50® Index (history · last edit) from [4]. Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Y No visible issues now. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Woolbridge Manor House (history · last edit) from [5]. Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Y Already cleaned. Article is a mess, but not a copyvio. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dow Jones EURO STOXX 50® Index (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Centre William Rappard (history · last edit) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted under today. Source incompatibly licensed, but tagger removed copyvio template thinking it might be permissible. Advised contributor why not, giving time to provide verification. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]