Wikipedia:Editor review/Belasted
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Reviews
- Please give a reasoning as to why you want to be reviewed as it is hard to review and editor who does not have specific things that they want reviewers to look at. Thanks.--TRUCO 22:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't really care to be reviewed anymore. Belasted (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Questions
Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I've done some work fixing disambiguation links to Producer. I'm pleased with my work fixing the prose in the True West (play), Ghetto Gospel, and other articles, though I wish I could have made them even better with good sources.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- After more than three months of editing, I finally got into a couple of conflicts almost at the same time. The biggest one was at the Media Take Out article with user MTO Poster. Whenever such conflicts occur, I do the following things, in varying orders: Bring it up on the talk page of the article or the user, ask an admin or editor with a good reputation for assistance, and lay back and wait for someone else to do something if I'm in danger of an edit war.
- Thank you for you time!
- I also just want to mention that I'm putting myself under review not because I expect any kind of praise. In fact I want constructive criticism because I realize that I could be a lot better as an editor and I would like some pointers. Belasted (talk) 02:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.