Wikipedia:Editor review/Little Mountain 5 (3)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Little Mountain 5 (talk · contribs) I would like to know what I need to improve on, as I'm thinking of possibly going through an RfA in the near future. Thanks, LITTLEMOUNTAIN5 review! 21:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Reviews
- Hello LM. Seeing your contributions, you edit a lot of talk pages. Its good that you communicate, but this makes up about 40% of your edits, while your Wikipedia space edits is only about 10%. If you wish to go to RfA, I recommend exposing yourself to other areas of WP, such as WP:XFD, WP:RPP, WP:ANI, or even here at WP:ER. You should also continue to edit at WP:RFA. I also recommend expanding/creating articles, as that shows experience. Your script-work is also great, which you should continue to do. Like you stated, if you get into a conflict, remain cool and if an IP is really pestering, use the appropriate process to handle it. Keep it Up.--Truco 00:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Great advice, thanks! LITTLEMOUNTAIN5 review! 20:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- 'ello. Good to meet ya. Now, down to business. You definitely need more edits in the Article namespace. Your most edited pages are AIV and your talk page. The Wikipedia and Talk spaces make up more than your article edits. So far so good, but make more article Namespace edits.--Unionhawk Talk 02:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)\
- Thank you. LITTLEMOUNTAIN5 review! 21:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using X!'s counter
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I am very proud of my work at Roxy Ann Peak, which I created, and, with a lot of help from other editors, got it to GA status. I'm also pleased with my anti-vandalism work, using Huggle.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.