Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 April 24
April 24
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted at author request (G7) R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:41, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:O Neg.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wilhelm meis (notify | contribs).
- Speedy delete, nom by creator, poor image quality, better image uploaded elsewhere. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DSCN0223.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Potatohead1 (notify | contribs).
- Free image, but no clue where this is. Bad name, no description, never used. – Quadell (talk) 00:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphan, not encyclopedic, unidentifiable – Quadell (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete. Unacceptable license. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Says "Only non-commercial or educational use of this file is permitted." in large letters. Not an acceptable license for Wikipedia. – Quadell (talk) 02:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GCSEcertificate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hiya111 (notify | contribs).
- Uploader is not the creator or certifier of the document MBisanz talk 02:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image used just for deleted article Sokha Helicopters. Not sure if copyright holder has license but still OR UE image. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Neapolitan_nativity_scene.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mtiedemann (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, may be issues with copyright in sculptures Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NazarethLocatie.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fuelbottle (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:GemNazarethLocation.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Netherlands_Empire.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timmae (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by images in http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Dutch_Empire Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:New_York_State_Towns.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nricardo (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:New York Population Map.png, some copyright issues (if eligible for copyright it's a copyright violation) Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by standard locator map Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:New_Zealand_Maritime_Forces_Review.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ross.browne (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, unclear if it falls under Template:PD-NZSection27 Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nevisflag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rhyddfrydol (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Flag of Nevis.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NeveleLocatie.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fuelbottle (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:GemNeveleLocation.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NewEnglandDistance.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fikri (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NewBeach-in-Orange-County.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Atanamir (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Orange County California Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Newport Beach Highlighted.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Njmap-0201.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CharlieZeb (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Bergen County New Jersey Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Allendale Highlighted.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Njmap-0202.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CharlieZeb (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Bergen County New Jersey Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Alpine Highlighted.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also nominating the following orphan maps of Bergen County which have also been replaced by SVGs:
- File:Njmap-0204.png
- File:Njmap-0205.png
- File:Njmap-0206.png
- File:Njmap-0207.png
- File:Njmap-0209.png
- File:Njmap-0210.png
- File:Njmap-0211.png
- File:Njmap-0213.png
- File:Njmap-0214.png
- File:Njmap-0215.png
- File:Njmap-0216.png
- File:Njmap-0217.png
- File:Njmap-0218.png
- File:Njmap-0219.png
- File:Njmap-0220.png
- File:Njmap-0224.png
- File:Njmap-0225.png
- File:Njmap-0226.png
- File:Njmap-0227.png
- File:Njmap-0228.png
- File:Njmap-0229.png
- File:Njmap-0231.png
- File:Njmap-0234.png
- File:Njmap-0235.png
- File:Njmap-0236.png
- File:Njmap-0237.png
- File:Njmap-0239.png
- File:Njmap-0240.png
- File:Njmap-0241.png
- File:Njmap-0242.png
- File:Njmap-0244.png
- File:Njmap-0245.png
- File:Njmap-0247.png
- File:Njmap-0248.png
- File:Njmap-0249.png
- File:Njmap-0250.png
- File:Njmap-0251.png
- File:Njmap-0252.png
- File:Njmap-0255.png
- File:Njmap-0256.png
- File:Njmap-0258.png
- File:Njmap-0262.png
- File:Njmap-0265.png
- File:Njmap-0267.png
- File:Njmap-0268.png
- File:Njmap-0269.png
- Delete Images have been superseded. — BQZip01 — talk 03:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Newport_coast_view_from_pch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Goodralph (notify | contribs).
- dot.ca.gov site has a big copyright symbol at the bottom, though its terms of use also say " In general, information presented on this web site, unless otherwise indicated, is considered in the public domain." source of photo is nonspecific so it's impossible to know if this particular photo had a copyright notice also Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless further and better particulars of the copyright status are provided. Stifle (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NewportBeachCALM.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Short_Verses (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Orange County California Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Newport Beach Highlighted.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, not sure why we need this image of text Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nf-reden.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Formeruser-82 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Newfoundland Red Ensign.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, replaced by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Nice Arms.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Nice Arms.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Nice Arms.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nida.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KansaiKitsune (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nineteenth_Amendment.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xoder (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:19th Amendment Pg1of1 AC.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nineteenth_Amendment.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Minesweeper (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:19th Amendment Pg1of1 AC.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, we now have better quality images http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:The_Niterói_Contemporary_Art_Museum Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NinoveLocatie.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fuelbottle (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:MnpNinoveLocation.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned Mfa fariz (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned Mfa fariz (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleted as orphaned non-free image Nyttend (talk) 14:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oakland_Chinatown_in_Alameda_County.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Petersam (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by maps in Chinatown, Oakland, California Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oakland_in_Alameda_County_in_California.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Petersam (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Alameda County California Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Oakland Highlighted.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ohblue.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Floridahistory (notify | contribs).
- per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohio's Blue Belt Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Old_Burlington_House.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chris_73 (notify | contribs).
- undated, impossible to determine copyright status (yes i know there is a year in the caption but that's not necessarily the year the art was done) Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, not enough info to determine encyclopedic use, unsourced Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Old_Otsego_County.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nonenmac (notify | contribs).
- replaced by File:Simeon DeWitt Otsego County NY c.1792.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Old-stuyvesant-building.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by A1111 (notify | contribs).
- source link is dead, no way to know if this is really PD or not Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- nonfree orphan, despite image description Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Flag of Hong Kong.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is different to the current flag, note the tips of the petals. Also not orphaned anymore. F (talk) 02:05, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless license can be clarified. The {{PD}} tag does not specify a reason why the image is public domain. Stifle (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NutritionFacts.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Atanamir (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nøkken_by_Theodor_Kittelsen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Salleman (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Noekken 01c.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kit body MelbourneVictory0809Away.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jakehikki (notify | contribs).
- per Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 April 5#Kit body MelbourneVictory0809Home.png, this image is unused and excessively detailed with respect to the style guidelines for kits – PeeJay 18:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. – PeeJay 21:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It is against the MOS for football clubs to include excessive detail such as shirt sponsors in the infobox, this file is not and should not be used. King of the North East 20:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I rather doubt that any football team has a transparent kit. Stifle (talk) 08:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Goes against the MOS. Dancarney (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Specific image has not been adequately discussed with critical commentary in its used articles, unnecessary screenshot of copyrighted software. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The rationales are for the articles in which the image is being used. The image contains a merge of both free and open source software and propietary software such as Microsoft Office. Which brings me to the second point in this: deleting this image is ridiculous in the sense that the image is perhaps unneeded in the Kubuntu and Ubuntu articles (although I'd say they quite are, more on that later), but completely needed in the article for Wine. This being that the previous image was non descriptive, and showed a very outdated, underpowered Wine where running IE was a novelty. Not only is this image integral to display the true potential of Wine in running the most important Office suite today, which has set the standard in document formats for more than a decade, a program which is only available on propietary software: Windows, and to a lesser extent, Mac OS X. Some of the few Linux concious users that have not made the switch yet don't do it because, sadly, Openoffice today still has very limited format for the Microsoft XML files (.docx, pptx, xslx, etc), and ODF has not yet made it into the mainstream, because, ironically, Office won't support it, thus continuing the vicious cycle. Since Openoffice is playing catch-up with Office, and so on and so forth. It is understandable that the image be removed from both the *buntu articles,although I consider it integral there too and even on the Linux article, but removing it from the Wine article is unessesary, silly, and demonstrates the lack of research done for this delete tag. The argument that this image has no use and is an unessesary screenshot of a copyrighted software, is, frankly, ridiculous. --Ugriffin (talk) 04:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the original nom's point was the fact that none of that is actually discussed in the WINE article. I see a mention of WGA, IE, and WMP, but nothing about MS Ofiice. Radiant chains (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Many people think Wine is underpowered. Wine has done a lot of progress, and it is imperative to show what it can do.--Ugriffin (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shifting-gears-screencap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FrameWave20 (notify | contribs).
- Film screencap, claimed incorrectly to be licensed cc and gfdl – Quadell (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nosferatu02_full.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Garryq (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, kind-of-duplicate of File:Schreck.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Normative_ethics.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jorgenc (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:North_ossetia_map_100px.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ChrisO (notify | contribs).
- scaled down version of File:North ossetia map.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NorthBendSP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mphamilton (notify | contribs).
- no permission given for derivative works, and not probably the best way to depict the park in an encyclopedia anyways Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NorfolkIslandPineKerikeri.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moriori (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, not very good quality, we now have better images http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Araucaria_heterophylla Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Olongapo_City_Seal.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Barrera_marquez (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Ph seal olongapo.png, probably not PD as claimed Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Onlinelearningimage.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Comm3511a (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:OosterzeleLocatie.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fuelbottle (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:GemOosterzeleLocation.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:OpenVMS_disks_example_1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lady_Lysine_Ikinsile (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:OrangeCALM.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Short_Verses (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Orange County California Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Orange Highlighted.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Neth odrorangenassau rib.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- no valid reason given that this photo is public domain Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Delete - Peripitus (Talk) 11:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free image used to illustrate information adequately described with (free) text. We don't need a screenshot to understand she appeared in the game. Jay32183 (talk) 23:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now Sure it is described that Bulma is in the game in some form. But there is no other reference to back the claim at this time. Also this is displaying one of Bulma's many appearances. As any person who has embraced the Dragon Ball franchise will tell you, Bulma's outwardly appearance changes quite frequently throughout the franchise. I've tried finding one image that adequately represents most of her appearances, but unfortunately none can be located at this time. Sarujo (talk) 04:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You still haven't explained why the image isn't freely replaceable by text. We don't need an image to show she's in the game or more than one image for what she looks like. We can't use a non-free image if free text will do, and free text is getting the job done in this case. Jay32183 (talk) 06:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- But I have, the "free text" is not good enough in this case as the information which states that she is playble only by cheating is not sourced. Sarujo (talk) 07:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So source it with text or remove it. You don't have to show an image to make that point. If the information can be understood, you can't have the non-free image. Including a non-free image is not how we source things on Wikipedia. Jay32183 (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- But I have, the "free text" is not good enough in this case as the information which states that she is playble only by cheating is not sourced. Sarujo (talk) 07:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You still haven't explained why the image isn't freely replaceable by text. We don't need an image to show she's in the game or more than one image for what she looks like. We can't use a non-free image if free text will do, and free text is getting the job done in this case. Jay32183 (talk) 06:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. You can cite images without uploading them. Stifle (talk) 08:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFCC#3. There are already enough images to identify the character in question. — BQZip01 — talk 04:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.