Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 30
March 30
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wish You Were Here CBS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by FotoPhest (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Same as File:WishYouWereHere-300.jpg except with slightly different background. Both images are not needed in the same article. –Dream out loud (talk) 00:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete, no use for two almost-identical nonfree images. Nyttend (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SterileEditWar.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Crotalus horridus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, only used for now-deleted template. Nyttend (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 04:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Israele Clima.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Renato Caniatti (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I've found a use for it. Nyttend (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Marksandspencer300.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Secretlondon (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but only because there's no real explanation of what this is. Nyttend (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jackass-Penguin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jurriaan Schulman (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. Nyttend (talk) 16:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Flat-Coated-Retriever.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jurriaan Schulman (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not the best image and superseded by the images on the article about this breed of dog. Nyttend (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Irish-Wolfhound3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jurriaan Schulman (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not the best image and superseded by the images on the article about this breed of dog. Nyttend (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Newfoundland-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jurriaan Schulman (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not the best image and superseded by the images on the article about this breed of dog. Nyttend (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pug2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jurriaan Schulman (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not the best image and superseded by the images on the article about this breed of dog. Nyttend (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mumbai.terra.600px.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hemanshu (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons, quite useful for illustrating Mumbai. Nyttend (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LeicesterMarket.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Morwen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, because I can't see what we'd do with it. Nyttend (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kawaramachi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sekicho (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: it's not clear what this is. Nyttend (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NEO egmont small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: it's not clear what this is. Nyttend (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons. Perfect for Egmont National Park. It may not be used on this Wiki, but can be useful to others. — ξxplicit 04:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NEO elbrus small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: it's not clear what this is. Nyttend (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons. Perfect for Seven Summits. It may not be used on this Wiki, but can be useful to others. — ξxplicit 04:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. 04:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- File:California Secretary of State building on October 7, 2003-750px.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mav (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I've found a use for it. Nyttend (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cannonstreet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Morwen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons — if not for File:Cannon Street station.jpg, it would be quite useful in the infobox at Cannon Street station, and it's a useful image for showing the details of the entrance. Nyttend (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree, move to Commons. —Bkell (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chancerylane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Morwen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, rendered redundent by Commons image File:Chancery Lane stn northeast entrance.JPG. Nyttend (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Waterloo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Morwen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I've found a use for it. Nyttend (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. 04:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- File:Liverpoolst.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Morwen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I've found a use for it. Nyttend (talk) 15:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hungerfordfootbridge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Morwen (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, rendered essentially useless by File:Hungerford night.jpg. Nyttend (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons: It's freely licensed, and it's probably good to have a daytime view of it too. —Bkell (talk) 10:50, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RustyBlackbird23.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Big iron (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Keep if someone can find a use for it. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons; nothing wrong with it, and it's a decent picture. Nyttend (talk) 15:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as move to commons. PhilKnight (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Capitolprison1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by AlexPlank (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons; the National Archives seems to think it a useful image, and it's definitely free. Nyttend (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphan JamesBWatson (talk) 13:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, useless vanity image. Nyttend (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ladclothing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Beno93 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphan JamesBWatson (talk) 13:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, useless vanity image. Nyttend (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Saintpolroux.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Neddyseagoon (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Sourced via French Wikipedia image page, but file was deleted there last year for lacking a source. Hekerui (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, see the Google Translate version of the talk page of the uploader at fr:wp — it was deleted there because it had no source, so this image doesn't have a valid source. Nyttend (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Toronto Skyline Night.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SouthWestFL-Gazette (notify | contribs | uploads).
- photo uploaded by blocked user claiming to be a newspaper, no evidence of permission Hekerui (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Downtown Toronto Night.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SouthWestFL-Gazette (notify | contribs | uploads).
- photo uploaded by blocked user claiming to be a newspaper, no evidence of permission Hekerui (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jrrt 1972 pipe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dbachmann (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Completely unwarranted non-free image. We have PD photos of the subject which could easily serve as infobox images. J Milburn (talk) 22:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.