Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 October 10

< October 9	October 11 >

October 10

File:Eurovision 2004 Postcards.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. This screencap is decorative, not informative; removing it would not affect anyone's ability to understand Azra Akin's article. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 17:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I remember correctly, the reason I uploaded this image was because no sources were found to verify the sentence "Akın modelled for the postcards of the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 which were shown before each song.". Prior to the upload of this image, this sentence was constantly removed.Turco85 (Talk) 19:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claims require references, not copyrighted images. Arguably, the image doesn't even verify the claim. Is that Akin in the image? I don't know. It's so low-res that it's hard to tell. With a source, there would be no doubt, which is the point. And I still contend that the image isn't required to understand the claim. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 12:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sarcastaball.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV episode screenshot of a cartoon series, used in infobox of episode article. Merely shows a generic picture of three main protagonists; the distinguishing feature in their dress is easy enough to describe in words and is not in need of visual illustration to be understood. Not otherwise the object of critical discussion. Entirely stereotyped, generic FUR lacking any reference to anything specific to this image or this episode. Fails NFCC#8, as so often. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The goofy costume's they're made to wear, as seen in the image, are specific to the episode. Nightscream (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and as I just said, that goofy costume is easy to describe in words. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - picture says a thousand words - often more elegantly than said words. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but that's a non-argument. You need to at least specify what that "more" is. And yes, here on FFD, you need to be able to do that in words. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NFCE-Uniform-NYG.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The logos on the clothes only seem to contain PD-textlogos, so the clothes seem to be in the public domain. As such, this is replaceable fair use: someone can draw a free replacement. Stefan2 (talk) 09:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NFCW-Uniform-SF.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All logos on these clothes are {{PD-ineligible}}, so the clothes are in the public domain. This can be replaced with a free drawing of the same clothes. The fair use rationale claims that the image isn't replaceable because it is "protected by trademark owned by above organization", but this is a misunderstanding of Commons:COM:NCR#Trademark law. Stefan2 (talk) 09:45, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wsico.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as public domain. Next time, please also remove the fair use rationale when you change the license tag. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No source specified. Please make sure that, this icon was used by a version of Wordstar. Vssun (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This seems to be ineligible for copyright, so it doesn't need a source from a copyright point of view; it is PD regardless. However, if it hasn't been used in any version of Wordstar, then I would argue that the image is out of scope, so it is sill useful to find out if the image has been used or not. A Google search for the image finds only three copies of the image elsewhere on the Internet: ml:പ്രമാണം:Wsico.PNG, [1] and [2]. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:21, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The ml image was copied from here itself. --Vssun (talk) 16:27, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WMCT Pre-hospital RSI scene Apr 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphan Jpj157 (talk) 13:38, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dettol - Tell me Dr (1935).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader keeps deleting problem tags. This is still orphaned and without a fair use rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Stefan, I've added rationale. Trying to get community feedback on WikiBusiness Project before I edit the Dettol page, since I work for RB. web250 (talk) 13:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-d plot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan and Unencyclopedic (unsourced, appears to be original research, not notable) Scray (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mercantile Marine Management's Flag.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, was part of an AFC that was declined. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shineelucifermv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vahe Avetyan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe yeah. Arantz (talk) 11:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0550.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image has no true encyclopedic value. Is almost a novelty image as it is a face appearing in a brick wall. No foreseeable use -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dentsu logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Commons image of the same name: commons:File:Dentsu logo.svg (tint of gray is slightly off, so ineligible for CSD#F8). Magog the Ogre (t • c) 20:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rotate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. No foreseeable use. Should be Latex. Stefan2 (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete confusing notation. It uses the same symbols for source and target coordinates, and doesn't use indentifiable sine/cosine markers. -- 70.24.247.66 (talk) 04:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we can render equations much better than this. --129.78.32.24 (talk) 02:44, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Factsbarnstar.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused barnstar. Kelly ^hi! 21:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Factoryshanghai.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence uploader is copyright holder - low resolution, no camera metadata, lack of history by uploader. Kelly ^hi! 21:14, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice that there are two different files with that name? Delete one as F9 (see [3] where it appeared in smaller resolution before it appeared on Wikipedia). Delete the other one as F1 (see File:GreatLakesEnergy logo.jpg). --Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Laurenaaquilinafoolspromotional.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File is tagged for use under Wikipedia's fair use policy, but it is being used to illustrate an article about a living person, so presumably, a free equivalent is or could be made available. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo ps.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by SVG: File:POSCO logo.svg Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.