Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 November 4

< November 3	November 5 >

November 4

File:Knowyourmeme.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaced by a PNG version in commons. --Bloonstdfan360 ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hearst logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unused --Bloonstdfan360 ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thu-011243.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Commons:File:Thurleigh-12Mar1943.png but not F8 as images not identical. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gerome-CharlotteRothschild.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated at Commons:File:Gerome-CharlotteRothschild.PNG . Not simple F8 as different format. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CSPF-Network.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vector version at Commons - Commons:File:CSPF-Network.svg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CharlottevovRothschild-Oppenheim.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Higher quality (but different rendering) on Commons at Commons:File:Charlotte artist.jpg , making this image redundant. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GrummanF4F VMF211 WakeIsland NAP80G179006.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Higher quality version at - Commons:File:Wreckage Wildcat Wake Island.jpg , but not simple F8 as that's a different format. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As original uploader, I support the deletion -- as the same image in slightly higher resolution is on the Commons, though in jpg vs this one as a gif. — ERcheck (talk) 03:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pbalson 20060527 IMG 3701.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image is duplicated by Commons:File:Pbalson 20060527 IMG 3701.png but not simple F8 as different format. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pbalson 20060527 IMG 3702.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated at Commons:File:Pbalson 20060527 IMG 3702.png but different format. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:F2A-1 VF-3 CV-3 Felix the Cat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Near but not quite identical image at Commons:File:Brewster F2A-1 VF-3 3-F-18 1940.jpg hence FFD not F8. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IEP2009 colage2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated at Commons Commons:File:IEP2009 colage2.png but in different format. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NII Holdings.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated at commons as different format - Commons:File:NII Logo.jpg - Should really be SVG. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:POSCO logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Available as vector at Commons:File:POSCO logo.svg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frank-grouard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full uncropped image on Commons as File:Grabill - Chief Rocky Bears home.jpg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Motorola.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On Commons Commons:File:Motorola.svg , does this actually meet TOO, in case it might be wrongly licensed? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC) How about people using it for there projects? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.7.181.123 (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The logo is too simple, but the SVG rendition might be copyrightable. In that case, our file violates WP:NFCC#1 as someone else could make a different SVG rendition of it. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ch zh wappen stadt.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vector version at Commons -Commons:File:Wappen Stadt Zürich.svg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Leyo 11:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crkvice.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At commons as Commons:File:Crkvice.jpg -Should really be SVG Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scottbrison.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image exists at Commons:File:Scott Brison.jpg with improved contrast and brightness. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malaysian Chinese Association logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vector version available at Commons - Commons:File:Flag of the Malaysian Chinese Association.svg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:President Roosevelt admiring globe given by US military, 1942.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image has a prominent Getty Wartermark, Surely if this was an official image a non-watermarked version is obtainable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The image is not at the source, and the watermark puts doubt on the claim that it is a government work. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The image is at the source. Scroll almost all the way to the bottom for coverage of the globe; if you go to "Churchill-Roosevelt Globe" and click the arrow next to "1 of 3", you'll see a non-watermarked version (enlarged edition), but I'm not clear on the copyright status. The image is taken from this journal article, which in turn takes it from somewhere else, as the image is inscribed "Courtesy of George C. Marshall Research Library". I'm going to guess that it's a PD-USGov-Army image (this globe and several others were ordered by Army commanders for Roosevelt and Churchill; presumably this is a promotional image meant to show Marshall the fruits of his labors), but since it's not specifically stated so to be, we can't assume that it is, so we have to delete in order to be safe. Nyttend (talk) 04:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Detail from Alfons Maria Mucha's "The Slavs in Their Original Homeland".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 17:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image is watermarked, If this is out of US copyright, then surely an unwatermarked version could be obtained. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep {{Imagewatermark}} is not a reason for deletion. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep unless we have an unwatermarked version. Nyttend (talk) 04:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I've removed the watermark.--Rockfang (talk) 00:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Rockfang: I'm still seeing a copyright notice at the bottom right of the image. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Have you tried Shift-Refreshing?--Rockfang (talk) 07:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - That's fixed it; my apologies. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closure with keep - Issue with watermark resolved.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:36, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taxal Lodge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Ymblanter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source given is a redirector to 'inappropriate' site Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JFH, Justice For Hire Season 1 Collected cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete fails NFCC#3a. Deleted by Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Violates WP:NFCC#3a, see File:JFH, Justice For Hire comic book issue 01 cover.jpeg. Stefan2 (talk) 14:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe this image violates any criteria. It shows the image of the first season of a series of books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kershawdraw (talk • contribs) 03:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - in my opinion, the addition of this image adds very little to the article. As Stefan2 notes, there is already a non-free image, so the inclusion of this image does not comply with WP:NFCC#3a. PhilKnight (talk) 13:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Honey Ltd. - Eli's Coming 45 label scan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article text contains discussion of this item. Image illustrates the work that is the object of discussion.Relbats (talk) 23:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not contain a discussion of this item. However, it contains a discography, which mentions the item. See WP:NFC#UUI §2. See also the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This item is discussed specifically in the "Career" section of the article.Relbats (talk) 21:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any discussion about the illustration on the disc in that section. The disc is mentioned there, although it isn't discussed, and the illustration printed on it isn't discussed either. Also, the image isn't used in that section; it is used elsewhere in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Divine Mother Bhabani.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 17:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At Commons:File:Divine Mother Bhabani.jpg, Use in article is irrelevant if image is free and 'useful' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? The image is not on Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If not at Commons, Withdrawn. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lord Carson.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:File:Edward Carson Vanity Fair 9 November 1893.jpg is a close match with higher resolution. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Low quality. Commons image is better. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EddieLyons.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:File:Eddie Lyons 001.jpg is a close match but at higher resolution. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:USS Calvert APA-32.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:File:U.S.S. Calvert-ii.jpg is a close match at marginally higher quality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion. I disagree that the Commons file is of "marginally higher quality", the Wiki version looks way better on my screen, the Commons file looks dull and indistinct by comparison. My suggestion would therefore be to transfer the en.wiki file to Commons, probably over the existing Commons version. Gatoclass (talk) 05:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:First Day Cover - JS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons image Commons:File:Firstdaycover JC.JPG is redacted and I see no reason why this needs to have the address retained. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EWallveelaevKalev (cropped).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:File:Allveelaev Kalev.jpg appears to be a full scan of the image concerned at slightly higher quality Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Our version is cropped, making it more useful for articles. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn- Local file renamed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file was moved from File:EWallveelaevKalev.jpg to File:EWallveelaevKalev (cropped).jpg by Widr (talk · contribs) at 12:34, 5 November 2013 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:11, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dassault Mirage 2000 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated by Commons:File:Dassault Mirage 2000.jpg, but not simple F8 as it is claimed tint/brightness differs. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FarNearFields-USP-4998112-1.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Acather96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vector version available at commons - Commons:File:FarNearFields-USP-4998112-1.svg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, should be del'ed, though I like it [still haven't caught up on svg's; know they are suppose to be "better"] ... and the new img has provenance. Cool. --J. D. Redding 23:49, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ecan-backlog-jan-08.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vector version on Commons - Commons:File:Canterbury Regional Council Consent Applications Backlog.svg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The information is clearly different. Is one of the images wrong? If so, which of them? --Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The local one is unlinked with one revision from 2008, the Commons version is linked to an article and has 16 revisions up to 2011 so it would safe to assume the Commons version is correct. Cube00 (talk) 15:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Graftonunderwood-8-mar-1954-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated by - Commons:File:Graftonunderwood-8-mar-1954.png, not simple F8 as different format. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Women's March on Versailles.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image at commons is higher quality - Commons:File:Women's March on Versailles01.jpg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:S100e5958.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closematch at Commons - Commons:File:S100e5958 cropped.jpg. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Supercupen2013.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus defaulting to keep. PhilKnight (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8: not what you would use for identification of a sports event. Stefan2 (talk) 19:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The image adds identification of the event by illustrating the stadium and two of the key players of the two teams that are playing. Also lists time, place and teams that are playing in the event. How does this fail the criteria when for example File:Supercupen2012.jpg, File:2011supercupenlogo.jpg and more importantly File:2013 UEFA Champions League Final programme.jpg passes the criteria? Please further motivate your reason for deletion.--Reckless182 (talk) 20:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Events like this are identified by including some photos of the event, not by uploading a rarely seen programme cover or poster. It doesn't change anything that you managed to find three other images which also fail WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional reasons to keep this image listed by PeeJay under File:2013 UEFA Champions League Final programme.jpg, as this is also the cover of a match program.--Reckless182 (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note – It should be used that match programs is a very common way of identifying a specific football match on Wikipedia. For example all of the UEFA Champions League finals dating back to the 1999 UEFA Champions League Final features the match program as the image of the article. A match program is also used for several FA Cup Finals.--Reckless182 (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Supercupen2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus defaulting to keep. PhilKnight (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, see above. Stefan2 (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – By support of reasons as to why a match program is a good identifier of a football match by PeeJay under File:2013 UEFA Champions League Final programme.jpg.--Reckless182 (talk) 19:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2011supercupenlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus defaulting to keep. PhilKnight (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, see above. Stefan2 (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – By support of reasons as to why a match program is a good identifier of a football match by PeeJay under File:2013 UEFA Champions League Final programme.jpg.--Reckless182 (talk) 19:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2013 UEFA Champions League Final programme.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus defaulting to keep. PhilKnight (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, see above. Stefan2 (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Every year, the UEFA Champions League final is given a specific visual identity as a way of recognising the host venue for the match. The match programme is probably the aspect of that visual identity that has the widest reach, and since the visual identity is something that should be discussed in the article (even if it isn't already), this image should be kept in relation to that. Furthermore, it serves as a specific visual indicator of the match itself, something that is covered by the Fair Use criteria. – PeeJay 21:30, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The articles IBM PC, Lego and Iphone 5 do not contain any kind of box art, programmes or posters. Obviously, programmes and posters do not act as identification for every kind of product. Whenever I read about a football match, what I see is not a programme cover but photos from the event. Different things are identified by different kinds of material. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, but fortunately for IBM, Lego and iPhone, they all have logos that they can be immediately identified by (and fortunately none of those are protected by copyright as they are simple text). If someone at the 2013 UEFA Champions League Final took a photo of the pitch during the game, chances are you wouldn't be able to immediately identify what event was taking place simply by the position and colours of the players. The programme cover – and by extension, the entire unique visual identity of the match – does provide that immediate recognition for the game. The only other thing that could do that is a photo of the stadium in full Champions League Final regalia, which would violate copyright for exactly the same reason; this is just a way of getting the best quality version of the logo into the article. – Pee Jay 12:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ceramic musical instruments by Ragnar Naess for Tan Dun.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Humble Bundle Total Purchases.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by File:Humble Bundle Total Purchases.svg. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Futurama ep53.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:NFCC#8. Image is not discussed critically in the article, so it is not serving a purpose outside of looking pretty. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.