Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 January 25

< January 24	January 26 >

January 25

File:Jaya Bhaduri in Jawani Diwani, 1972 film.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it. Why do we need a non-free image of this actress now when we have free images of her on Commons? I don't see any superb rationale either to keep this particular image in both the articles for which rationale is given. Maybe the situation was different in 2009 when it was uploaded. But now we have to let it go. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Toy story 3 ost.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSFILM#Soundtrack and fails WP:NFCC#8, removal of the file will not be detrimental to the readers understanding of the article topic. Soham 07:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's an original album cover, if not why is it on iTunes Music? UBS talk 09:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Who is saying that it is not the "original album cover"? It fails the two I have mentioned above. Take the time out to read them in full, should solve all your queries. Soham 12:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UTorrent (logo).svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakenly created. UBS talk 09:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as an uploader-requested deletion. For future reference, if you upload the wrong image and want it to be deleted, you can add {{db-g7}} to the description page, and an admin will come around and delete it before long. Nyttend (talk) 22:36, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Campaign poster during the That general election, 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk)

Derivative work of a copyrighted image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, though it was his photograph so it was okey. Sorry, if its wrong. Nnot used to uploading images.

I would add how do we know its a copyrighted image? Its part of a publ;ic space, an elecotral campaign is not going to copyright their image. The more use the better for them.Lihaas (talk) 13:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep unless there's some sort of non-copyright problem. Please look at Commons:Template:FoP-Thailand or the Thailand section of Commons:COM:FOP — a photo of a copyrighted artistic work exhibited in a public place isn't a copyvio under Thai law. The old revisions of the image demonstrate that this was exhibited in a public place; it's definitely not something taken in private. Nyttend (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is amazingly free... in Thailand. What about the US? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Think of it this way: when an image is safe under FOP provisions in its country of origin, it's accepted under the Commons licensing standards, and anything accepted by Commons is safe here. In other words, if we moved it to Commons, we'd still be fine using it on an en:wp article. Otherwise, we'd have to delete most or all of the images in Commons:Category:FoP-Thailand. Nyttend (talk) 01:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - although it could do with being renamed to File:Campaign poster during the Thai general election, 2014.jpg Jr8825 • Talk 14:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michaela Age Progression.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, not the subject of commentary in the article in which it is used Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oil storage tank with truck 1966.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. The cartoon figure in question is already pictured in another image on the same article, and we don't need visual illustration to understand the idea that, among other things, it was also printed on oil tanks. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vaibhav upadhyay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Stifle - Peripitus (Talk) 00:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC) Three images uploaded by Vaibhavupadhyay (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). This is a three-part nomination, embracing File:Vaibhav upadhyay.jpg, File:Vaibhav upadhyay and his friends.jpg, and File:Vaibhav upadhyay in adikaal.jpg. All three are unused, and they're completely unencyclopedic: they were uploaded for use at User:AXiS CreepyPastas, which was essentially a WP:MYSPACE violation (see WP:AN#User:AXiS CreepyPastas for a relevant discussion), and not at all useful for anything else. Nyttend (talk) 22:27, 25 January 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.