Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 25

< November 24	November 26 >

November 25

File:Shenaz Culture Shock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an image solely for decoration - no critical commentary. Delete. Kelly ^hi! 00:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nomination. — Kralizec! (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:640px-5x16 - Felina PROMO 5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Does not pass WP:NFUR: not used for educational purposes. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:48, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Anatomists Notebook - by Devlin Crow.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I could speedy this or not, so I'm bringing this here.

Long story short, this was uploaded in 2013 Devlin crow, with the assertion that he held the copyright for this work and that as such, he was giving it up as fair use. However in a comment at refund he makes mention of "my client", which gives off the strong impression that he is not Crow and/or that he does not hold the copyright to the image.

To complicate things further, a GIS for the image brought up this link that credits the image to Leonardo da Vinci. Other links like this and this that show the image from different angles seems to support that this is a close up of Da Vinci's sketch. (The Royal Collection even has an image of this.)

It's possible that Crow drew a copy of the sketchbook, since a lot of artists do things like this. However this just seems to be too dodgy, given that we have no idea who actually uploaded the image (Crow? his agent?) and the person who created the image is also in question. Between these concerns and the fact that this image isn't used anywhere, I think that it'd be a good idea to just delete this from Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware that the basic sketch is in the public domain and I'm not sure if this was actually altered any or not. I'm leaning towards not, given that we have at least one image that is substantially similar. If any changes were made (assuming this wasn't a copy) they were so minor (or nonexistent) that I don't think that Crow could really pass this off as his work. That we don't know who uploaded it exactly is a big issue as well. I think that it'd just be a safer bet for this to be deleted, given that this is all so vague. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:48, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the picture also is available on Commons as File:The Anatomists Notebook.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
...and it's being discussed for deletion there, too. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:25, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The image is attributed to Devlin Crow. However, the uploader has repeatedly stated that they are not Devlin Crow ([1] [2] [3]) and no evidence has been provided that Devlin Crow has released the image under a free licence. See also Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 November 29#File:Artists & Couple Devlin & Kennedy Crow.jpg. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This file is not being used anywhere, and a better quality version can be obtained (possibly free) from https://www.royalcollection.org.uk/collection/919058/recto-the-cranium-sectioned-verso-the-skull-sectioned and uploaded to Commons. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:25, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.