Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 12

< May 11	May 13 >

May 12

File:Smalllogop.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Cryptic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Corresponding article deleted. No longer serves a purpose. Malinion (talk) 00:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charlie Walk photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licensed under {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} on Flickr, but this appears to be a case of license laundering. There is no evidence that the user on Flickr—his only upload—is the copyright holder of this professional photo. — ξ ^xplicit 00:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Press release photo - see http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/charlie-walk-promoted-to-president-of-newly-formed-republic-group-300218654.html - we would need better proof for a creative commons license --Whpq (talk) 13:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Consider requesting the addition of the Flickr account number, 142600549@N03, to c:User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Well that is disturbing, I'll nominate speedily right now ... and am probably never going to use Flickr again to find pictures ... Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 16:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anderson CVI Team Logo Raiders.jpg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid fair use rationale. The image is the logo for the school's sports teams and not the school logo which is also in the article. The purpose claims to serve as the primary means of identification of the entity in questions, but the subject of the article is the school and not the school's sports team. Whpq (talk) 00:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pickering High School Logo Trojan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid fair use rationale. The image is the logo for the school's sports teams and not the school logo which is clear when you see the school's web page. The purpose claims to serve as the primary means of identification of the entity in questions, but the subject of the article is the school and not the school's sports team. Whpq (talk) 00:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dunbarton High School Logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid fair use rationale. The image is the logo for the school's sports teams and not the school logo which can be seen at the school's web page. The purpose claims to serve as the primary means of identification of the entity in questions, but the subject of the article is the school and not the school's sports team. Whpq (talk) 00:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zebrafish_blastocoel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC) File:Zebrafish blastocoel.jpg[reply]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Zebrafish_blastocoel.jpg#DELETE.3F_Copyright_infringement :-

DELETE? Copyright infringement

This image is virtually illegible at the resolution posted. It is impossible for the author of the image to have created it at such a low resolution. I find it hard to imagine that the creator of the original image would not want some form of connection to their work, for it to be legible, for them to be known, for their work to be known or found, etc. The image looks as if it has been copied from an online source and posted without permission or attribution. IMO the file should be deleted. LookingGlass (talk) 05:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

ADDITIONAL INF. re https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion

Item 1 I cannot see a way to add - ffd|log=2016 May 12 - to the file page (there is no option to do so on the page)

Item 2 There is insufficient information given to enable me to comply. I gave up trying at this point and posted the relavant information here and on the talk page of the file page concerned.

LookingGlass (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CEAP Mindanao Games 2016.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that the uploader is the original copyright holder. If they are, then OTRS should be sent a permissions email per WP:CONSENT. If they are not, then this is most likely non-free content and should be converted to such. The problem with doing that, however, is that file does not satisfy WP:NFCCP for the way it is currently being used in Father Saturnino Urios University - Arbp. Carmelo D.F. Morelos Campus#Notable Events at the Morelos Campus. Finally, based upon Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 4#File:Robinsons Place Butuan-Logo.png, User talk:Ronald Galope Barniso#File:Main Fire from Polysports.jpg as well as that the fact that the uploader created their account on May 4, 2016 and has uploaded more than 50 image files since then, there is a chance that there might be other files with licensing problems that might need some clean up. All the files were likely uploaded in good faith; it may be that the uploader is just not very familiar with licensing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: File was deleted per WP:F7. So nothing more to discuss here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ShahrdaryClub.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from Shahrdari Tabriz FSC Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logo is being used in Shahrdari Tabriz F.C. and Shahrdari Tabriz FSC. A non-free use rationale is provided, but it seems to be an attempt to combine two uses into a single rationale which is something not really allowed per WP:NFCC#10c. There this is a possible problem with No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. The "parent entity" in this case seems to be the Shahrdari Tabriz Cultural and Athletic Club which does not have a stand-alone article. "Shahrdari Tabriz F.C." claims that it is the team that Shahrdari Tabriz FSC is most widely known for, so that seems to make it the "parent" entity and the futsal team the "child entity. On the other hand, "Shahrdari Tabriz FSC" claims that it is the team that the Shahrdari Tabriz Cultural and Athletic Club is most widely known for which would make it the "parent entity". The consensuses for similar FFD and NFCR discussions have been that non-free usage is only OK in the parent entity's article and I think that should also be the case here. I am just not sure how that should be determined. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Separate, specific non-free use rationales have been provided for each use, so the NFCC#10c concern has been resolved. There is still, however, the UUI#17 issue that needed to be resolved. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The URL given as the source for the file seems to have been re-registered, but I was able to find this January 2011 archived version. File was uploaded in December 2010, so this might acceptable for verifying the source. The page is in Farsi, but the logo can be seen. A Google translation of the page and the url address seem to indicate that "Shanrdari Tabriz F.C." is the parent per UUI#17 in this particular case, which means that the file should be removed from "Shahdari Tabriz FSC" based upon previous FFD consensuses. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Apple tvOS.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3 because it is very high-resolution and very detailed. So, I went ahead and uploaded File:Apple tvOS screenshot.jpg which is smaller. (I chose JPEG because it gave superior size for equal quality to PNG.) But User:Aspects reverted the change, well, because he prefers the large and shiny NFCC-violating version. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This PNG file violates WP:NFCC#3b, so the PNG file should not be used in the article. Instead, the article should use a smaller image, for example the JPG image uploaded by Codename Lisa. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have reverted my own edit now that I know why the image was changed. An edit summary explaining why it was changed, a revert with an edit summary explaining why it was changed or discussing it with me could avoided this discussion. Aspects (talk) 03:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Aspects: Wait, what? You didn't know about NFCC? Wow, I didn't see that coming. You are a wiki-veteran after all. As for a revert, I was not allowed to; per Wikipedia:Editing policy § Talking and editing, I made the edit, you reverted, so it was time for discussing. (BRD) Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Professor Emeritus David Brading.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this appears to be a photograph of a photograph, and therefore a breach of copyright. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GrowCut Algorithm Demo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No source given for original photograph. Kelly ^hi! 10:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Work is derivative from the original image. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Badge Of Chatra Nandalal Institution Serampore.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused logo. Kelly ^hi! 10:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence that this is in the public domain in the first place. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Badlaavngo2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused logo. Kelly ^hi! 10:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BakerHuntingAttire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low quality. File:BakerRhinoBuff.jpg seems to be the better version. Kelly ^hi! 10:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete but it's been replaced. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BulgarianBagUse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 10:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader didn't assert that he was the copyright holder. That is credited to Stephen Nave. However, there is no evidence that the image has been released into the public domain as claimed in the licensing. --Whpq (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Craig hamilton.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 11:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Finally 054.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 11:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fresh FM Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused logo. Kelly ^hi! 11:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons. Image is now in use and has a license compatible with Commons. ★ Bigr Tex 02:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hal Blaine.Wrecking Crew.JPEG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 02:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 11:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:: I believe that the image I downloaded is in fair use. Assuming that it is fair use, then it should be kept. Its presence in the article is properly justified, contrary to the previous editor's assessment. I disagree that the image fails the criteria of WP:NFCC#8. The image is clearly necessary for readers to identify the individual who is being discussed in the article. Deleting the image will do readers a disservice. The image in no way will hurt the image's owner's commercial opportunities, but rather provide him access to a wider audience, by allowing the Blaine's likenesses to be seen by readers who would otherwise be unaware of his work. I ask that this fair use image be retained. Garagepunk66 (talk) 16:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of people are only needed in the articles about the respective people. This is not an article about the depicted person. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article about a group of personalities who made up a closely-knit circle of session musicians who have been much-talked about as of late. I have chosen certain photographs of key people who are recognized as playing crucial roles regarding the ensemble. Hal Blaine is pictured because he coined the term "Wrecking Crew" is often considered their de facto "ring-leader"--not only for his peerless musicianship and band leadership skills, but also his penchant for jokes and humor, which have become the stuff of legend. By the way, it is he that wrote the first book about them, so he has probably done more than anyone else to bring them to the world's attention. The Wrecking Crew is intrinsic to his story--just as he is usually the first name that comes to mind when discussing the Wrecking Crew's story. Therefore, his picture is absolutely necessary for inclusion in the article. I also chose a photograph of Phil Spector, because it was work with the group that brought them to preeminence in the recording world--so his role is absolutely key. And keep in mind that Wrecking Crew, in turn, were essential to Spector's "Wall of Sound". No comprehensive article about the Wrecking Crew should fail to include his picture. In fact, it was from an article about the Wrecking Crew (in Wall Street Journal) that I took the photo (not an article about Phil Spector)--this picture is really so much about them. The Wall Street Journal could have selected from a variety of other photographs, but chose this one because it is so fundamental to our understanding of the Wrecking Crew. By the way, Sonny Bono is pictured in there as well, along with other members of the Wrecking Crew, so it is not just a picture of Phil Spector. I tried to find photos taken in the 1960s to give the reader a feel for time and place and help establish a meaningful context. I want the reader to be able to visualize what it must have been like being there. So, I believe that these photos are essential to achieving that end and that the article would be badly diminished without their inclusion. I ask for your understanding. I have put a lot of work into this article and am trying to do what is best for the article. These pictures are so necessary to help illustrate and educate concerning this topic. Garagepunk66 (talk) 03:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove: We don't need to see an image of Blaine to appreciate the statements that he coined the term "Wrecking Crew" or had a good sense of humor. Fails WP:NFCC#8.

If this particular photo is quintessential to depictions of the band as you say, then it might pass. By quintessential I mean what Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima is to the Battle of Iwo Jima (and even that photo doesn't pass in the latter article, because the photo has its own; if it didn't it would). Even then, the appearance of this particular photo needs to be discussed in reliable sources, and those discussions need to be referenced in the article. Only then does the reader need to see the photo to understand what is discussed. That the WSJ used this photo, and mentioning this, alone would not be enough: you'd need to reference how the WSJ and other sources discuss this photo. A photo being the object of sourced, critical commentary meets WP:NFCC#8, but choosing a photo for "a feel for time and place" does not. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We should now Keep: the photo is definitely quintessential in the exact same way you made the analogy to Iwo Jima. And, we now have a direct source (Drummer Café) placed after the caption under the picture (and statements in the article sourced to Drummer Cafe).^[1] Please come to your senses people and do what is right for this article. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Featrured Musician: Hal Blaine". Drummer Cafe. Drummer Cafe.com. Retrieved May 12, 2016.

No, we should not. There is still no discussion of the photo itself in the article. Please read my explanation above. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of statement about the picture do you recommend that I make? Just word it for me, and I'll put it in, provided it makes sense to use it. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference statements made about the appearance of the picture in reliable sources with due weight. If nothing is said about how the picture looks in sources, or there is only a passing mention, then there is nothing you or I can do here. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove: I disagree with Garagepunk66's assessment and also don't think this usage satisfies NFCC#8. I don't understand why the reader needs to see this particular photo to understand "Hal Blaine was one of the "first call" session drummers with the Wrecking Crew and is usually credited for coining the term 'Wrecking Crew' to describe the unit". What exactly about that caption requires the picture? The same information and reference can be added to the article content with no loss of information without the photo. The cited source does not specifically discuss the photo itself; it even uses another photo to identify Blaine. In addition, Blaine is mentioned by name about 10 times in the body of the article and I do not see anything that requires this image be seen to understand any of that, so that removing the photo will not be detrimental to the reader's overall understanding of either Blaine or the Wrecking Crew. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Picture, but allow its use it in Blaine's Article: I understand that we will not be able to use the picture in the Wrecking Crew article, so I can gracefully accept that. I am not an expert Wiki photo policy--I am primarily a writer. So, in order to save the photo, I have removed it from the Wrecking Crew article and placed it in Hal Blaine's article, where I put it in the info box, depicting Blaine at the pinnacle of his career in the 1960s. Please let it be used there. I will not include it in the Wrecking Crew article. Sorry for any inconvenience. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now you're basically claiming that the file is being used to identify Blaine, but there was a freely licensed version from Commons already being used in the infobox for that purpose. The non-free photo now also fails WP:NFCC#1. I simply do not see any way to write a valid non-free use rationale for such a use. For sure, you can edit the rationale to change the |article= parameter, but it wouldn't be a valid rationale and the file would probably be quickly tagged with {{di-replaceable fair use}}. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The photo is a nice photo, but I don't see how its non-free use satisfies WP:NFCCP. Is there any way this could be converted to PD, perhaps say {{PD-US-no notice}}? -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, folks--this is getting ridiculous. I think that I have made a friendly compromise and found a workable solution. This is why good people get fed up with Wikipedia. Please, do me a favor--can you please be the one to convert it yourself and keep it, because I have worked hard enough on this. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it fails WP:NFCC#1 in Hal Blaine where it is used to identify the subject in the infobox, because for that purpose the free image File:Hal Blaine in 2008.jpg is sufficient. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image of Blaine depicts him at the pinnacle of his career during the 1960s, when he and the Wrecking Crew were active and at the top of their game. It serves the purpose better than the later photo, but I have placed the later photo further down the page to portray him at different stages of his career. I could also do an expansion of the article to better justify two pictures. Go ahead and do what you wish. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article about Blaine is not just about him when he was at the top of his game, it's about him in his entirety. If your proposed solution was all that was needed to remove the NFCC#1 concerns, then the same line of reasoning could be pretty much applied to any BLP article for anyone considered to be past the pinnacle of their career. A non-free image could probably only be justified in this case if there was something so remarkable about Blaine's appearance at the time that it he received coverage in reliable sources for it. Is that the case? If not, the primary reason for using the image revert backs to identification of Blaine which clearly fails NFCC#1 in my opinion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no debate against the article reflecting his whole career--I think it should. I had just said that the article can now have two images: one earlier and one later--best reflecting the whole from two different poles. The picture in the top info box shows him in the context in he is most remembered (the heyday in the 60s with the Wrecking Crew), and the one at the bottom shows him in the 90s. I don't for a minute advocate removing the bottom photo, just as I hope no one would advocate we remove the picture from the top. We can include both. But, it is now out of my hands, let the chips fall as they may. Garagepunk66 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content is required to satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria. Using the photo to indentify Blaine in the infobox is something not really allowed per NFCC#1. This is something that has been discussed quite a lot at NFCR and FFD, and the established consensus is not to allow it. Moreover, your argument of showing Blaine in the context in which he is most remembered would only satisfy NFCC#8 if that was something being said by a reliable source, not you. How you interpret the picture is your original research or your synthesis of sources or your knowledge about Blaine. As Finnusertop pointed out above, it is the photo itself, not Blaine, which should be discussed by reliable sources; otherwise, any old photo taken roughly around the same time could be just as easily used which means usage is primarily decorative not contextual. The information you get from that picture is that Blaine is playing the drums which is the basically the same information you get from the free version. The reader doesn't need a non-free image to understand that Blaine is drummer. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phil Spector and Sonny Bono with the Wrecking Crew.JPEG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 11:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: I believe that this image is in fair use. Assuming that it is fair use, then it should be kept. Its presence in the article is properly justified, contrary to the previous editor's assessment, because it is necessary so that readers can identify the people who are being discussed in the article. The image will in no way hurt its owners' commercial opportunities, but rather grant them access to a wider audience via greater recognition of their subjects' likenesses. For these reasons I contend that there is noting in the image fails the criteria of WP:NFCC#8. I ask that the image be retained. To do otherwise would do a disservice to our readers by depriving them of a relevant and necessary image. Garagepunk66 (talk) 15:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image is sourced to Getty Images so this use fails WP:NFCC#2.--Whpq (talk) 17:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize that Getty is off limits--I'll make sure to avoid their photos in the future. Perhaps I could see if there is a similar image from another source that would be acceptable--I just hope that a good one can be found. I'm trying to make article as illustrative and informative as it can be, so that people can learn about these great musicians. Garagepunk66 (talk) 19:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we could get permission from the owners to see if they would let us use the image. I cannot possibly see how they would object. But, I could try to find another image and pass it through you to see if it would be acceptable if this one can't fly. Garagepunk66 (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We have a citation to the Wall Street Journal article after the caption under the picture with Phil Spector and Sonny Bono with the Wrecking Crew. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove: Visual aspects of the picture are not the subject of critical sourced commentary (fails WP:NFCC#8). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Harveysbest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - orphaned product image. Kelly ^hi! 11:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heavenknows.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused personal file. Kelly ^hi! 11:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hpgraphic.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, possible nonfree. Kelly ^hi! 12:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ian McNabb, Digbeth 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: tagged in OTRS queue czar 22:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence the copyright holder has released the photo into the public domain. The linked Facebook post only gives permission to upload the file on Wikipedia. Kelly ^hi! 12:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucracy as usual. I never expect anything less from Wikipedia, and it really puts me off editing :( Feel free to contact the Copyright Owner, he'll be more than happy to offer up the file according to your rigorous terms, I'm sure. --Jonie148 (talk) 12:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonie148: I messaged who I think is the photographer on Facebook. We'll see what he says (if he responds). Unfortunately, the permission you got from him is not sufficient. :( Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Calliopejen1: Thanks, the Photographer's account is at https://www.facebook.com/john.kidd.752?fref=ts . I've messaged him myself too, just to further explain the situation :) I'll update here as appropriate too. --Jonie148 (talk)

Update: the photographer has been back in contact with me regarding the image, and wants to know exactly how he can go about declaring the image to be in the public domain? He's more than happy to. --Jonie148 (talk) 14:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Update: (hopefully the final one) I formally invited the photographer to release the image under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0, He did, and I've subsequently updated the photographic evidence of this, which is still at the same page, linked on the image's licensing information. I've changed the license for the image to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 correspondingly. Should be all sorted now. --Jonie148 (talk) 15:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He should contact permissions-commons

wikimedia.org. They can help him with this. There are also instructions at WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, those instructions are the ones we've followed, see http://albumsoutof100.weebly.com/ian-mcnabb-digbeth---license.html . --Jonie148 (talk) 17:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Interview Outfit 1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 12:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jack Ellis (writer).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence at given source that the photo is in the public domain. It merely says "royalty free". Kelly ^hi! 12:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jamesnichollsfire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 12:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Indianamemorialstadium.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PennsylvaniaHousePhoto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gaynorcawleybaseball.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ThomasTigueHousePhoto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gaynorcawleybillclinton.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Few people would be able to take a close-up photo of a president like this. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Afghan Taliban mujaheddin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations?. Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taliban training video, 2014.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations?. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Islamic State (IS) insurgents, Anbar Province, Iraq.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations?. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manitoba Provincial Road 366 map.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manitoba Provincial Road 280 map.png. Stefan2 (talk) 14:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per comments at Commons deletion discussion. Does not appear to be copied from Google Maps to me. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:American-college-of-sofia-faculty-house.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus Nthep (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Own collection" does not necessarily mean "own work". Stefan2 (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think this image is almost certainly taken by the uploader. It is consistent with his other uploads (several appear to be scans of pre-digital photos, see e.g. [1]) and his description of another "Personal Collection" (see upload description) photo from Sofia strongly suggests he took it[2]. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- See #File:American-college-of-sofia-sanders-hall.jpg below. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:American-college-of-sofia-sanders-hall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus Nthep (talk) 19:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Own collection" does not necessarily mean "own work". Stefan2 (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think this image is almost certainly taken by the uploader. It is consistent with his other uploads (several appear to be scans of pre-digital photos, see e.g. [3]) and his description of another "Personal Collection" (see upload description) photo from Sofia strongly suggests he took it[4]. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Ideally, he should indicate who the author is. See also Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 February 14#Files uploaded by Grbpradeep, but those files had other problems in addition to vague statements. It seems that the user has edited Wikipedia this month, so maybe we could keep this open for a bit longer to see if he reacts? --Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2016 (UTC)#[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enevon Brain Image.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The permission only applies to the uploader and is limited for non-Commercial purposes. Stefan2 (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zwannemanatwiki 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Z-logomagshimey - new flag Ale final.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yuri Ruley.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A member of MxPx. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yuri ice throne.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yvette Cooper Meeting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. Looks official. Cloudbound (talk) 17:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons We don't appear to have any other free photos of Emily Thornberry. I dug up the description (caption) that was put on the photo on the day it was uploaded. The photo actually includes three notable people and we should go ahead and move it to commons. ★ Bigr Tex 02:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YVS Chowdary.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep YVS Chowdary. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xterra.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 17:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yamu logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yannick 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yarongreif.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yasca-screenshot2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 17:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YCPC Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YanGlu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wyfx logo 2009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 17:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wylcard Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused promotional photo. Cloudbound (talk) 17:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wynns logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 18:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XB Logo 2012.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xfardic-notify-Screenshot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XFarDic-screenshot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 18:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xopsbanner.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused banner. Cloudbound (talk) 18:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xobdoweblogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wtaf84.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Co BeaverCreek villlage3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether "Personal photo" in the upload summary means own work or not. If not, then it is unsourced. Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment One other upload that says "Personal photo" also says "Created by author".[5] I'd wager that this is own work but am not totally confident. Note that if this photo is deleted because of authorship concerns, the remainder of the user's uploads should be nominated/deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:N330H 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file information page quotes a permission which applies to certain images. Unfortunately, it is unclear what the permission allows you to do with those images, so the permission is useless. Stefan2 (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DiscoConsoleCaptPJ701v8p1p640.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The words "image acquired and uploaded" do not necessarily imply "Own work ". Stefan2 (talk) 19:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ktec50.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source not provided by the uploader. The source was added by Sfan00 IMG, but it is unclear where or how he obtained the source, so there is no way to verify if it is correct or not. Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Orbs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Stefan2 (talk) 19:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit body gallitoshome.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Son of Saul (poster).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: use the first poster identifiable in the English language – no prejudice as to which, discuss on talk page as needed czar 22:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Film Fan changed the poster from Hungarian to American. However, Son of Saul was mostly Hungarian, if not European. The previous version must have been Hungarian, so it should be changed back to what it was. George Ho (talk) 20:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox images are supposed to be recognizable to English-language audiences on English Wikipedia, so it makes more sense to use a poster from an English-language country. I'd agree with you if the country of origin was an English-speaking country, of course. — Film Fan 23:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Film Fan, neither Template:infobox film nor WP:FILMNFI encourages an English-language image. This is a film, not a video game, whose community typically encourages English-language cover boxes. If you are insistent on having an English-language poster, how about this one instead? This might have been released in Hungary. George Ho (talk) 23:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It won't let me comment again on the discussion, for some reason. Anyway, I don't see any reason to use the poster you suggested. As I mentioned, English Wikipedia is for the English-speaking world, and using a poster from Hungary--regardless of what words are on the poster--doesn't seem to have greater benefits than using the current one to me. — Film Fan 00:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Taken from my talk page. --George Ho (talk) 00:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, an English-language poster should be used. There is somewhat of a consensus to that end at Template talk:Infobox film/doc#Specific guide for film posters. I'm assuming that the ambiguity of wording in the present doc about using the "original" release poster is intentional: it can be either in the original language or, the first English poster. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Finnusertop: Is this the first to you? George Ho (talk) 02:12, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PhilipReeve2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The linked page doesn't contain this image. No evidence that the copyright holder has released this to the public domain. Stefan2 (talk) 20:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I quickly found the image at [6] from the linked page (appears to be a crop of [7] also from the linked page). I also quickly found the post from July 7, 2014 where the subject of the photo claims that all images on the page are in the public domain and asks anyone to please put one on Wikipedia (by searching for "Public Domain" in the "Search for posts on this Page" feature). The uncropped image states "Here's one Sarah McIntyre took of me in Dubai, plotting to take over the world." If the subject asked for the picture to be taken, then they may well be the copyright holder and able to release it into the Public Domain. There is certainly intent by the subject for it to be PD. ★ Bigr Tex 01:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it was taken by Sarah McIntyre, then we need OTRS from her. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Passap.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a software screenshot. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Truck driver and friend, in front of a blue tractor-trailer cab (c. 2006).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overwritten file: two in one.

Picture of two people in front of a lorry: claimed to be from a website, and claimed to be in the public domain. The link is dead, so these claims can't be verified. No evidence of permission, and too low quality to be useful for anything anyway.
Picture of a single man: no source and no licence. Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BrennhausenDBauer1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete no OTRS ticket located. If one is received and permission is valid, file can be restored. Nthep (talk) 18:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear what kind of use the permission covers, and there is no OTRS ticket. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The email string is included in the description. I told my cousin that he would need to put the images in the public domain to which he agreed.--CSvBibra (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Email needs to be forwarded to WP:OTRS. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CSvBibra, would you please send email verification of author permission (OTRS) and then update us? czar 22:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samtheminuteman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mineola street scene 1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It says that this was created by Danny Burton, but it doesn't say who Danny Burton is. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm pretty sure Danny Burton is the uploader. See [8]. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- He also attributes many other images to Danny Burton, so I guess that's likely. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scenicrailway4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pepito3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear authorship claim. It says "Jose Luis Garcia, Computer File" but I'm not sure if this means that Jose Luis Garcia is the author or that Jose Luis Garcia is related to the file in some other way instead. It is also unclear who Jose Luis Garcia is. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BCTransit bus9290.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The links are dead, but the permission statement which is quoted on the file information page is insufficient as modification is prohibited. Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joewiebe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Joe Wiebe Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joey battenburg.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Joey battenburg Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joey in seventh grade.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Joseph Franzoni Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joey Pinter wikipedia Picture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Pinter Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joevedeen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Joe vedeen Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joevegetables.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Vegetables (band) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr zoidberg590: Fair enough, this used to be a part of a series of pages on the seminal music festival munkyfest which was deleted for some reason as not important enough to americans. Delete it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr zoidberg590 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joemerinosheep.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of permission, "for use on wikipedia" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joedyeing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joedyepot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joedyedfibre.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joeteasing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joeblending.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carding.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joespinning.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joeweave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joeteasles.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joeknit.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of permission, "forwikipediause" permission (despite gfdl/cc tags) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joefamily.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unverifiable source -- may be PD but would depend on when published, and i think we should have a source to verify this is in fact the johnson family Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joetextbook.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textbookunion.com Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JoeTribCrop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Murphy (podcaster) (2nd nomination) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joeweberphysicist.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

image does not appear on source page; photographer plainly didn't die 70 years ago Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gerardus J. Sizoo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

likely copyright violation, bogus PD reason (might be true but user applies this text regardless of truth to many uploads) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[Drummer_Cafe_(Blaine)-1] "Featrured Musician: Hal Blaine". Drummer Cafe. Drummer Cafe.com. Retrieved May 12, 2016.

[1]