Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 August 6

< August 5	August 7 >

August 6

File:Tell Me You Love Me UK cover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8; deluxe edition and UK edition artworks are not required to further enhance the understanding of the article. livelikemusic talk! 04:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per NFU. Tell_Me_You_Love_Me_(album) already has a image representation. --DBig Xray 11:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tell Me You Love Me Deluxe edition cover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8; deluxe edition and UK edition artworks are not required to further enhance the understanding of the article. Also, uploader is NOT the copyright holder of this material. livelikemusic talk! 04:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per NFU. Tell_Me_You_Love_Me_(album) already has a image representation. --DBig Xray 11:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Demi Lovato - Demi Deluxe edition cover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8; deluxe edition and UK edition artworks are not required to further enhance the understanding of the article. Also, uploader is not the copyright holder of the work. livelikemusic talk! 04:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per NFU. Tell_Me_You_Love_Me_(album) already has a image representation. --DBig Xray 11:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NFU as above Chetsford (talk) 09:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Non-free screenshots in The Day Today

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple non-free screenshots being used in The Day Today, but neither of their respective uses seem to meet WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#8. None of the screenshots themselves are the subject of any sourced critical commentary within the sections where they are located, so the context generally considered necessary to satisfy NFCC#8 is not present. The article content where the screenshots are being used can be more that sufficiently from understood as text per WP:FREER, so removing the screenshots will not be detrimental to the reader's understanding in any way. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nematocyst-discharged.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status. May be undeleted once someone can confirm that the original is in fact PD as claimed -FASTILY 00:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from Ukrainian Wikipedia, where it was deleted for unspecified reasons. No source information beyond that. —innotata 02:10, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this such a long time ago I cannot remember the details of the usage policy on the Ukrainian wiki. Using a reverse image search reveals many uses of the image but all after the upload here, so it is possible they have taken it from Wikipedia. This link suggests Nature Education has copyright, though again this postdates the use of the image on WP. Their usage policy:

You may reproduce this material, without modifications, in print or electronic form for your personal, non-commercial purposes or for non-commercial use in an educational environment.

It is a striking image which supports the article Cnidocyte especially with the comparison to File:Nematocyst_discharge.png. It would be a shame to lose it. Are you asserting that this is not public domain because we cannot trace who released it? WP had different standards of attribution in 2006 so we may now have lost the original source information.

Can anyone look at the archive of the Ukrainian WP page to see if another source was linked? Is this usage policy from Nature Education enough for WP use? |→ Spaully ^~talk~ 09:18, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Spaully: It's pretty safe to assume Nature Education are the copyright holders or licensed it, a major publisher are unlikely to falsely claim authorship. In order to be considered free (libre) content, commercial use and modifications must be allowed. In order for us to know something is free content we need to know who created it and how it is free content. —innotata 01:15, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For comparison image 2 on the Coral Reef page they also claim copyright over originated from a NOAA page on Corals (and this one). I rewrote the Coral page back in 2006-08 and found the NOAA images then to add to the WP page, but not the Nature Education page. Our image is also larger, with extra information on the left side. This National Geographic article also predates the Nature site.

Those misgivings aside, it doesn't provide evidence of public domain for this image. Who would be able to check a deleted page on Ukrainian WP, an admin? Do you know of any admins here who are also Ukrainian? |→ Spaully ^~talk~ 08:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:09, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Sanya3 of Wikipedia:Local Embassy#українська (uk). Maybe you can locate a helpful admin on the Ukrainian Wikipedia to provide information about the original upload? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 August 14. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 04:52, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shehla Masood.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph is identified in the source as being a picture of Shehla Masood's alleged murderer, Zahida Pervez, not Shehla Masood; as such, the Fair Use rationale is invalid. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Franglish - SIGN1TURE, Disc 1- Hip hop-side.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F6 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image (based on a Google Images search) appears to be related to Travis Scott's Astroworld album. This particular variant of the image was created by a fan and posted to the net here. In no case can this image be considered fair-use for an album by a different artist. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:11, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jul & Kalash Criminel - Putain de braquage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid fair use rationale, as the article which this file was used to illustrate has been deleted. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tide Mills tidal and wind mill.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 August 14. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 04:52, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tide Mills tidal and wind mill.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Year 2000 North Korea stamp commemorating the North Korea-loyal "Unconverted long-term prisoners" held in prison in South Korea (비전향 장기수).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 August 14. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 04:52, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Year 2000 North Korea stamp commemorating the North Korea-loyal "Unconverted long-term prisoners" held in prison in South Korea (비전향 장기수).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.