Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 August 31

August 31

File:Palace Museum (Chinese characters).svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If use this as a logo for Palace Museum, then this is probably above c:COM:TOO China. Otherwise, the image's encyclopedic value is questionable. — Ирука¹³ 00:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rizal Monument, Calamba (close-up side) (Chipeco Ave., Calamba, Laguna)(2018-08-21).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for sculptures in US. — Ирука¹³ 00:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Please see c:Category:Rizal Monument, Calamba City. Appears to be a statue in the Philippines, which has no FoP (also note the statue was made in 2011 so c:Template:PD-Philippines-FoP work doesn't apply). —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 15:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It shuldn't be deleted because the monument is a government property. Public funds may have been used in building this structure dedicated to the Philippines' national hero, so no any private claim may apply. Patrickroque01 (talk) 03:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As pointed out below, per Rizal Monument (Calamba), the sculptor (Jonas F. Roces) was simply commissioned by the Filipino government to build the statue. He was not a government employee. Therefore, c:Template:PD-PhilippinesGov doesn't apply. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 14:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as well as another of uploader's image file below. Copyright is the issue here and not physical ownership, something the uploader seem to confuse. Public funds do not negate sculptor's copyright. Jonas Roces, the artist and author (reference), does not seem to be a regular employee of the government and was just commissioned by the government. Section 178.4 of the copyright law states copyright is still held by the person who created the work, not the person who commissioned the work, unless there is a written stipulation of copyright transfer (Patrick Roque must provide proof of such document). So unless such document is presented by the uploader, copyright is still held by Roces and this statue artwork is unfree. Roces is still alive, so no date of future restoration of the photo. Undelete and transfer to Commons if ever the FOP introduction move by the Pilipinas Panorama Community user group is successful (see meta:Pilipinas Panorama Community/Freedom of Panorama#Recent developments for updates on this). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per JWilz. Sculptor is not a government employee. Should be undeleted and moved to Commons if Philippines gets a suitable FoP. Abzeronow (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rizal Monument, Calamba (close-up) (Chipeco Ave., Calamba, Laguna)(2018-08-21).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for sculptures in US. — Ирука¹³ 00:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Please see c:Category:Rizal Monument, Calamba City. Appears to be a statue in the Philippines, which has no FoP (also note the statue was made in 2011 so c:Template:PD-Philippines-FoP work doesn't apply). —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 15:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It shuldn't be deleted because the monument is a government property. Public funds may have been used in building the structure, so no any private claim may apply. Patrickroque01 (talk) 03:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The use of public funds in building a structure, even if there was proof of that, doesn't affect its copyright. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CW38 WADL logo.webp

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Uploaded better quality logo to Commons. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as superseded. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Queen of Pakistan letter to King of Iraq.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 September 7. ✗plicit 07:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen of Pakistan letter to King of Iraq.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KMTW KSCC UPN Kansas 2001 logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-simple (= non-free) logo used in violation of WP:NFCC#8. — Ирука¹³ 05:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to Commons: Logo is clearly below the threshold of originality in the US. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 15:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Background and arrangement are not simple shapes. Stifle (talk) 10:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Stifle: What do you mean? It's just a simple gradient background with simple shapes and some text. Definitely below c:COM:TOO US —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 17:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a simple gradient at all, there are three different colours, it dissolves at different points of the top, middle, and bottom, etc. Stifle (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very much above TOO, and fails NFCC8 per nom. House Blaster^talk 12:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WADL CW38 2023.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 September 8. Whpq (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:WADL CW38 2023.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IBEW Flag.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The image goes outside the c:COM:TOO. — Ирука¹³ 15:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northern Hairy Wood Ants, Hardcastle Crags, Yorkshire (31st May 2005).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no real foreseeable use case, questionable licencing with a watermark. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 15:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Antes's 1759 violin.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Antes's 1759 violin.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Antes Silhouette.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Antes Silhouette.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GiancomoLosi.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that the photo was published anywhere. — Ирука¹³ 22:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andrea Doria 1940.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Whpq (talk) 04:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that the photo was published anywhere. — Ирука¹³ 23:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Simple photographs, like this one, were protected only for 20 years after creation, so this WWII photo was out-of-copyright in Italy well before the URAA date. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Red-Tailed Hawk. Could be moved to Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this image meets the definition of a simple photograph and was created prior to 1976 and published without a copyright notice before 1 March 1989, then it was out of copyright in Italy on the date of restoration (January 1, 1996) and is currently in the public domain in the United States (17 U.S.C. § 104A). — Ирука¹³ 18:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a simple photograph, and unless we want to believe the photographer left the negative in a drawer for over 30 years, it is reasonable to presume this was published in the 1940s. Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nikki Cross WWE.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused cropped version. — Ирука¹³ 23:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.