Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 March 16

< March 15	March 17 >

March 16

File:Vcinsurgencyorg2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 02:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contains non-free graphics from Microsoft per the description. Other component images are missing their sources. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The content has a noncommercial restriction due to the use of clipart, so we can't host it as if it were available under a free license. There's also not a currently valid fair use claim, as the file is orphaned. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 07:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slyfam-thankyou-1969.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 02:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not contextually significant to the whole song Thank You (Falettinme Be Mice Elf Agin). Sample unneeded; song title and band name already suffice for readers to utilize to seek full recording. George Ho (talk) 03:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crop and Keep. The 30-second clip serves as the primary means of aural identification of the subject by giving an audio sample of the chorus, and there is no other means by which to aurally identify the subject except by taking a different fragment of the song. The contextual significance is also there; the fragment serves to increase understanding of the song itself by letting the reader hear part of it. That being said, I don't see a real justification for any part of the clip after 00:18 that can be justified under the principle of minimum use; a re-upload of a shorter version and a revdel of the current version seems to be wiser than deleting this outright.
— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As an update, I've uploaded a new version cuts 10 seconds off the file's length. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slyfam-everydaypeep-1969.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 02:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not contextually significant to the whole song Everyday People. Sample unneeded; song title and band name already suffice for readers to utilize to seek full recording. George Ho (talk) 03:30, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The 15-second clip serves as the primary means of aural identification of the subject by giving an audio sample of the (one-line) chorus, and there is no other means by which to aurally identify the subject except by taking a different fragment of the song. The contextual significance is also there; the fragment serves to increase understanding of the song itself by letting the reader hear part of it. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slyfam-stand-1969.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 02:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not contextually significant to the whole song Stand! (song). Sample unneeded; song title and band name already suffice for readers to utilize to seek full recording. George Ho (talk) 03:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The 20-second soundfile serves as the primary means of aural identification of the subject by giving an audio sample of three lines of the verse, and there is no other means by which to aurally identify the subject except by taking a fragment of the song. The contextual significance is also there; the fragment serves to increase understanding of the song itself. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slyfam-dance-1968.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 02:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not contextually significant to Dance to the Music (song) and Dance to the Music (Sly and the Family Stone album). Sample unneeded; song title and band name already suffice for readers to utilize to seek full recording. George Ho (talk) 03:36, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The 19-second soundfile serves as the primary means of aural identification of the subject by giving a fragment of its chorus, and there is no other means by which to aurally identify the subject. The contextual significance is also compelling; the fragment serves to increase understanding of the song itself. I do agree that it would be wise to remove it from the article on the album, but that is not the same as deleting the file wholesale. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baby-love-supremes-1964.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 02:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not contextually significant to the whole song Baby Love. Sample unneeded; song title and band name already suffice for users to utilize especially to seek full recording. George Ho (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The 17-second soundfile serves as the primary means of aural identification of the subject by giving a fragment of its chorus, and there is no other means by which to aurally identify the subject. The contextual significance is also compelling; the fragment serves to increase understanding of the song itself. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Someday-together-supremes-1969.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 02:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not contextually significant to the whole song Someday We'll Be Together. Sample unneeded; song title and band name already suffice for users to utilize especially to seek full recording. George Ho (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The 20 second soundfile serves as the primary means of aural identification of the subject, and there is no other means by which to aurally identify the subject. The contextual significance is compelling to keep the sound file. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A-car.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image is obviously a composite from other images. As a derivative work, we need to have information on the elements used to create the image. For example, I found the image here where there the license states "Wallpaper use only". However, the site allows user uploads so the provenance of the image from that site is not at all clear. Whpq (talk) 04:08, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not currently in use on ENWP and I can't imagine where it would be useful. Car already has plenty of images of different cars that aren't shoddy Photoshop jobs like this one. That combined with the potential copyright issue nominator mentions makes this entirely a liability. QuietHere (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The file is orphaned, and it's of dubious licensing status. As such, we should delete the file out of precaution, if nothing else. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Linkin Park - Powerless.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved, no longer a matter for FfD -FASTILY 02:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File is double the usual acceptable length of non-free audio clips per Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Audio_clips. QuietHere (talk) 12:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File has been tagged with {{Non-free reduce}} which hopefully will get the issue solved and I guess means this can be closed now. QuietHere (talk) 04:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:13WMAZlogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be free, but I'd rather not unilaterally relicense it. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 21:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KATU logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KWNB-KHGI.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KTVO logo 2022.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is of poor quality. Please delete it as there already is a logo to replace it. Brainyshark03 00:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wcti.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whamrochesterdt2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WHAM-TV logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WICD 15 ABC Champaign.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WICS ABC 20 Springfield.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:10, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WRGT LOGO MYTV legal gry.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}} (see: c:File:MyTV Richmond logo.svg for a comparable file). As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WJLA Circle 7.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States. Additionally, I cannot find a copyright registration, despite this being created in 1975 and c:File:Seven Network 1989 being on Commons with a {{PD-textlogo}} license. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wsyx thistv 2013.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. I see no reason that this file is required to be under fair use, and I would call for this to be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WTVC Fox Chattanooga logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WTVC logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be (just) under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WXLV logo 2023.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kdbc mytv 2012.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}} (see c:File:MyNetworkTV 2D Logo.svg, which is very similar). As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kdbc dt2 thistv 2012.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}} (see: c:File:This TV logo.svg). As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KEYElogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KFDM1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KGAN2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}} (see: c:File:CBS Eyemark.svg for why the eyemark is in the public domain). As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kepr.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-logo}} (the CBS eyemark is in the public domain). As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KRCG Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-logo}} (note that the CBS Eyemark is itself in the public domain). As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KTVL logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-logo}} (see: c:File:CBS Eyemark.svg for why the eyemark is PD). As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KTVL Southern Oregon CW 11 logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-textlogo}}. As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WGAN-TV Logo.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright renewal appears to have ever been filed for this logo, despite it being first published in 1954. As such, this is {{PD-US-not renewed}} and it can be moved to Commons as such. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wpec tv 2007.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very small file, but it does appear to be a {{PD-textlogo}} that we can move to Commons as such. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WTVH5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo appears to be under the threshold of originality in the United States as a {{PD-logo}} (see: c:File:CBS Eyemark.svg for why the eyemark is PD). As such, this should be re-licensed to indicate its public domain status and moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KECA-LD1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file is below the threshold of originality in the United States (see: c:File:File:The CW.svg for the general "The CW" logo). As such, this should be re-licensed as {{PD-textlogo}} and moved to Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:36, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WFLI-TV MeTV Chattanooga logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a {{PD-textlogo}} (see: File:WBGR-LP's Alternative-Me-TV Logo.png). As such, this should be relicensed and moved to Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kfox 2008.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a {{PD-textlogo}}, which should be re-licensed and uploaded to Commons as such. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KPTH44.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is pretty clearly a {{PD-textlogo}} that should be moved to Commons, but it's currently labeled as non-free. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:44, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KPTH-DT3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The CBS Eyemark is in the public domain, so this is a pretty clear {{PD-logo}} that can get moved to Commons. No need for us to treat this as non-free. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WRSP-WCCU Fox 55-27 Illinois Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this file is below the threshold of originality in the USA, and I don't see why we need to treat this as non-free. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:48, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FOX28WTGS.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pretty clear {{PD-textlogo}} that should be moved to Commons; no need to treat as non-free. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whuf 2019 tv.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pretty clear {{PD-textlogo}} that should be moved to Commons. I see no reason to treat this as non-free. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WZTV-DT2 Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pretty clear {{PD-textlogo}} that can be re-licensed and moved to Commons as such. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WCYB5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a {{PD-logo}}; the NBC peacock is on Commons as being in the public domain, and the rest is uncopyrightable text. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wjar dt2 2009.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a {{PD-textlogo}}; see this logo on Commons as being in the public domain. As such, re-licensing and moving to Commons seems warranted. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WNWO Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a {{PD-logo}}; the NBC Peacock is on Commons as being in the public domain, and the remainder of the logo seems to be uncopyrightable simple text. The arrangement is under the threshold of originality in the United States, so it makes sense to re-license this to {{PD-logo}} and move it to Commons. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wpmilocal15.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The simple NBC Peacock is on Commons and is in the public domain. The remainder of this appears to be uncopyrightable simple text with simple backgrounds. As such, this appears to be below the threshold of originality in the United States, and can be moved to Commons as a {{PD-logo}}. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:58, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.