Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 October 12

October 12

File:Utas Men 2023.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source website does not indicate image is in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 08:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pokken Tournament Chandelure.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image currently serves a purely decorative use in the article; it does not aid significantly with understanding the commentary it is attached to, and is overall not necessary for understanding the subject overall. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - concur with nomination, and is redundant to the image already in the infobox. -- Whpq (talk) 19:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fleetwood Mac - Say You Love Me.ogg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded per rationale about the sample's usefulness and necessity for readers to recognize the song. I still have reservations about the sample. Other media can play the whole song legitimately and legally and can do the same roles that the sample does. Secondly, from my (re-)reading of "contextual significance" criterion and NFC guideline's clarity of "contextual significance and the song article using the sample, the sample is supposed to clarify what the whole article says about the song.

Hearing the whole chorus over and over within the sample, I fail to see how the descriptions about and receptions toward the song fail to be contextually understood without the sample. Furthermore, I'm unconvinced that a small sample suffices to contextually signify the song. The whole article already suffices to make the whole song contextually significant, making this sample unnecessary. Even the song title and the band name already suffice also. George Ho (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the stated purpose of "To demonstrate song in article" fails to establish any sort of context for use that would meet WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sw15sept2001.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is a scan of the Socialist Worker (published in the UK), in which File:Socialist Worker front page.jpg already exists to serve as the main depiction. Being redundant except for showing the newspaper's old format (which is just another illustration that can be omitted), the file fails WP:NFCC#3a, and should be therefore deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The claimed purpose of identification is already being served by the image in the infobox. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.