Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-06-19 Jane Roberts
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Jane Roberts |
| Status | closed |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | MaxMangel (talk · contribs) |
| Parties involved | Caleb Murdock (talk · contribs) |
| Mediator(s) | Grobertson (talk · contribs) |
| Comment | Last update: 17:16, 17 August 2006 |
[[Category:Wikipedia Mediation Cabal closed cases|Jane Roberts]][[Category:Wikipedia Mediation Cabal maintenance|Jane Roberts]]
Mediation Case: 2006-06-19 Jane Roberts
[edit]Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.
Request Information
[edit]- Request made by: MaxMangel 01:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- In the article called Jane Roberts
- Who's involved?
- User:Caleb Murdock
- And myself
- What's going on?
- The new user, Caleb, although in his own way is trying to improve the article, is either ignorant or uncaring as to rules such as WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NPA,WP:AGF and probably others. He is currently reverting my changes without citing any reason. He has stated he is 'no longer negotiating' with me. He claims I am not qualified to edit the article. On the discussion page he makes personal attacks rather than reasonable attempts at dispute resolution. His edits are biased. He is essentially a big fan of Jane Roberts and so is put offside that I'm trying to add criticism. The discussion and evidence of this is on the Talk page.
- What would you like to change about that?
- He needs to be shown that he is breaking a number of wikipedia rules. If he can be taught to edit properly then he may be a useful editer. A mentorship might help. It might help if he were blocked for a time so that he can learn what he is doing is wrong.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- No, he needs to be contacted by people other than me. I would like someone to contact him and be very clear about where he is going wrong.
Thanks for any help.
Mediator response
[edit]Prepared to assist. Grobertson 23:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Please:
- Don't make personal attacks. Even if you think another editor's mother is the stupidest whore ever to violate a zoning ordinance with her beach towel, don't say so. It doesn't help ;)
- Indent comments with colons, so it's easy to see who said what.
- Sign comments by going ~~~~ at the end.
No activity. Closing case. --Ideogram 03:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Compromise offers
[edit]This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
Discussion
[edit]While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.