Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-06-16 Unidentified flying object
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Unidentified flying object |
| Status | closed |
| Request date | 21:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
| Requesting party | Unknown |
| Parties involved | Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The (talk · contribs), kwami (talk · contribs), ScienceApologist (talk · contribs) |
| Mediator(s) | Cdmajava (talk · contribs) |
| Comment | Stale case. No response to inquiry into need for further mediation. |
[[Category:Wikipedia Mediation Cabal closed cases|Unidentified flying object]][[Category:Wikipedia Mediation Cabal maintenance|Unidentified flying object]]
Request details
[edit]Because I have tried to make sure all viewpoints are presented in UFO. I have been told that most views that are not scientific are not welcomed/wanted/important. Today I found the talk page full of strike throughs where those who support my view have been stricken out. This also effects a vote for merger proposed by skeptics. Magnum Serpentine (talk) 21:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Who are the involved parties?
[edit]See above. I do not know how to get people's IP address
- Magnum Serpentine (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks)
- Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks)
- Kwami (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks)
- ScienceApologist (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks confirmedsuspected)
What's going on?
[edit]I am trying my best to make UFO neutral and with no point of view over another point of view. I am trying to preserve the article as the original writer or writers wrote it.
What would you like to change about that?
[edit]I would like to be assured that the article will not be slanted toward a Skeptical viewpoint but would include all viewpoints. That terms like Quack, fringe and other terms are not used. I want this article to state while a majority of UFO siteings have been explained there are other siteings that are unexplained. I would like to ensure that all viewpoints are represented. I also want the article to be neutral, and not make fun or be offensive to those who honestly feel they saw a UFO.
Mediator notes
[edit]- Case submitted. Magnum Serpentine (talk) 21:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Opened case. Atyndall93 | talk 01:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Suggesting compromises on article talk page. Atyndall93 | talk 10:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Gathering proposals. Atyndall93 | talk 04:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Administrative notes
[edit]Discussion
[edit]- Discussion is here
I do not know how to fill out parts of this form. Please feel free to correct my errors and to help finish the form. I am not at war with the three people above that I have listed. I want to be friends with them and not cause any bad feelings. I would like them to understand I am trying to do this in good faith. I hope we can get a good neutral article out of this with no viewpoint being held over another.