Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Company Portal Batch 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Company Portal Batch 2

Scope limited to a single company and subsidiaries which is too narrow for WP:POG These were all created with the one page auto error generating script by various users. We have deleted many individual company portals already as seen at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal MFD Results and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:British Airways. These come from Category:Company portals. An earlier batch here still being voted on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Company Portals Legacypac (talk) 03:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I think we've determined by now from past MFDs that individual companies aren't appropriate for a portal. It also looks like a lot of these are mass created navbox portals which we also seem to be generating a consensus against. Meszzy² (talk) 04:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All are nav box ones, I excluded pages created before the spree. Legacypac (talk) 04:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right - no idea why I said "most" instead of "all". Meszzy² (talk) 07:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And right there I don't know why I wrote "most" instead of "a lot" which was really what I said. Words are hard apparently. :) Meszzy² (talk) 07:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

- An automated portal, created 2018-12-14T18:10:06Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Panasonic

- An automated portal, created 2019-03-05T23:46:08Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:BT Group

- An automated portal, created 2018-09-09T06:52:52Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Budd Company

- An automated portal, created 2019-01-02T03:57:22Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:The CW

- An automated portal, created 2018-09-09T21:45:57Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Daybreak Game Company

- An automated portal, created 2019-02-04T12:37:54Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Nestlé

- An automated portal, created 2018-12-07T05:29:36Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Twitter

- An automated portal, created 2019-02-06T04:15:06Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Yahoo!

- An automated portal, created 2019-01-02T03:54:38Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Warner Bros.

- An automated portal, created 2019-01-05T18:55:41Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Virgin Group

Pldx1 (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Courtesy ping: portal created 2017-07-16T23:44:21Z by User:Namcokid47: Portal:Bandai Namco Holdings. Pldx1 (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep those that have sufficient content to support a portal, specifically: Portal:BT Group, Portal:Yahoo!, Portal:Virgin Group, Portal:Warner Bros., Portal:Panasonic and Portal:Nestlé - these are more like major conglomerates with many subsidiaries and diverse areas than single companies. Delete the others as they don't seem to have sufficient breadth of content available. Thryduulf (talk) 13:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Portal:Virgin Group, Portal:Warner Bros., Portal:BT Group and Portal:Yahoo!. All are perfectly fine portals for large multi-national corporations which have a wide-enough scope to sustain a portal. Gazamp (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all None of these has the breadth-of-subject-matter required by the WP:POG guideline. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
also per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:The WB and [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nick Jr.]] which are like Portal:The CW Legacypac (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Portal:The CW does have rather the same sort of feel as Portal:Nick Jr. did, but the portals I identified as worthy of being kept are noticeably more complete. Thryduulf (talk) 22:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 19:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Portal:Bandai Namco Holdings wasn't created in the spree. It was created by User:Namcokid47 on 16 July 2017. Possible conflict of interest, but does not seem to fit in the bundle. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. It was created earlier. It's a toy company so I don't take the creator name as a COI. I'll nominate this one separately. Legacypac (talk) 23:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Not !voting at this time because of bundle mismatch. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

see results on some big name companies here Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Fast Food Portals Legacypac (talk) 23:42, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Whether the company is a "big name" or not is completely irrelevant. What matters is whether there is sufficient content on Wikipedia about them to sustain a viable portal. Thryduulf (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. I have checked all these portals, and every one of them draws its "selected article" list solely from a single navbox. That makes them a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of the navbox and of the head article which transcludes the navbox. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Substandard automated portals. Portal:Companies is enough. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.