Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ariyan Mehedi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ariyan Mehedi

It has been deleted 5 times in one year. Nominating for deletion and salting after speedy deletion request was removed by creator. No notability vanity page. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete g11. This is a waste of space. CUPIDICAE💕 15:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: deletions actually uses more server space BTW. Sounds counterintuitive, right? But that is how you are able to restore deleted content. Aasim (talk) 17:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was metaphorical. CUPIDICAE💕 14:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - The drafts have been deleted as G11, advertising, not for notability, and drafts are not deleted for lack of notability. The title should be ECP-salted in article space so that only a neutral reviewer can accept it, because the musician might become notable in the future. The repeated submissions should be dealt with by partial block, or by WP:BLOCK if the editors are not here. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - User:Awesome Aasim - I don't think that User:Praxidicae means server space. We know that server space just expands. I think that she means a waste of pixels that are seen by the reader. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with all the arguments to delete, I just wanted to comment that deletions actually use more server space. Aasim (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — I’m not seeing what notability criterion is satisfied here. Celestina007 (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: pure spam that needs to be purged by G11. Java Hurricane 14:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under G11, authors are globally locked. — csc^-1 01:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, both the mainspace title and the draft title. The page is definitely G11. The subject is not notable and has no forseeable chance of becoming notable. Wikipedia should not be used to host this type of material, even in project/user space. Nsk92 (talk) 13:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Vanity article. RationalPuff (talk) 11:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.