Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Krishna Hoccane
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . with salt. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable and repeated sock/spam creation. Unlikely to pass AfC in the near future. See Krishna Hoccane etc... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and SALT Legacypac (talk) 19:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and salt, which does not just save us a time drain, but the creator as well, who will not succeed in using Wikipedia for this purpose and is therefore wasting his or her own time.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This is a draft, not an article. It is therefore not indexed by search engines. Lack of proper or sufficient sources is not a policy-based reason to delete a draft, nor is apparent lack of notability. It may be that sufficient sources will eventually be found and added. Until then, this does no harm that I can see. DES (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I concur with nom and other delete votes. Waggie (talk) 15:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.