Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Skye Nicolas
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft that keeps getting resubmitted to the AFC queue with no attempt to actually address the reasons it's been getting rejected. The sourcing is not solid enough to get this approved -- it depends far too strongly on blogs and glancing namechecks of the subject's existence in coverage of other things, not substantive or reliable coverage about Skye Nicolas himself. But the creator has made no attempt whatsoever to improve the sourcing at all since the article was first rejected for that reason last July -- they've simply made minor formatting adjustments to the article's coding (e.g. changing an http to https), and then repeatedly resubmitted it for another kick at the can without ever actually adding even one new source that wasn't already in the article the first time. This is crossing the line into tendentious disruption. Bearcat (talk) 05:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete that reads so hyped. I hope his art is better than his promotional efforts. Legacypac (talk) 05:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - The language is some sort of jargon anyway, which indicates that it isn't likely ever to be improved. If it were promotional, it would be G11. As it is, it is just jargon. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Single purpose account repeatedly pushing the Resubmit button with no attempt to make any significant improvement in response to comment. KJP1 (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.