Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Dangun
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux Talk 22:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Not sufficiently broad subject area, as required by WP:POG. No Category, no template, so what do you get? Redlinks. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - limited scope. Not every page is portal suitable. Legacypac (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - But wait two or three days. This one has been created to provide some arguments at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal: Discretionary sanctions for all discussions about portals. I suppose that you already know that portals are hard to create in user space. Pldx1 (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- I do not think they are hard to create in the User Space (or the Draft space). UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- You are welcome to try by yourself, or look at the code of all the involved templates and modules, and compare. Pldx1 (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Who says one must use the templates and modules? UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Who says you must use the templates and modules when you want to discuss about the time it takes when you use the templates and modules ? Pause and coffee, maybe. Pldx1 (talk) 17:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Who says one must use the templates and modules? UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- You are welcome to try by yourself, or look at the code of all the involved templates and modules, and compare. Pldx1 (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- I do not think they are hard to create in the User Space (or the Draft space). UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - This is another portal about a historical figure who is important in a country but not known outside that country. This portal does not appear to have multiple articles and multiple images. That is, it doesn't even appear to navigate. This does illustrate that portals shouldn't be created arbitrarily, because it appears to have been created without preparation. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Delete, but wait two or three days. This one has been created to provide some arguments at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal: Discretionary sanctions for all discussions about portals. Don't try to convince me that an arbitrary created portal has been arbitrary created, I am already convinced. Pldx1 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.