Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Waterfalls
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Automated portal which draws its "selected articles" list from 4 list pages: List of waterfalls, List of waterfalls by flow rate, List of waterfalls by height, and List of waterfalls by type.
The lists do a much better job both as a navigational hub and as showcase, because they display full set of links, while still allowing preview via mouseover.
No previous un-automated version. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Automated portals are questionable at best. List-based automated portals are no improvement over navbox-based portals, and this is no exception. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Legacypac (talk) 04:05, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Automated portal, 0 subpages, created 2018-12-15 15:14:43 by User:TTH, useless navigation tool, redundant to the existing articles and navboxes, and of lower quality: Portal:Waterfalls. Pldx1 (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice to non-automated, thoughtful and curated recreation. SITH (talk) 12:47, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - has a significant number of related articles so a good candidate for a portal. Might need some work due to the method of creation, but that's not a valid reason for deletion. WaggersTALK 10:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.