Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dnshitobu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dnshitobu

WP:NOTWEBHOST, but the statements about the Dagbani Wikipedia are potentially admissible, so U5 may not apply. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:04, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Good Userpage for a contributor. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
U5 most definitely does not apply, because the user is a contributor. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've seen much more detailed userpage autobios, with much less connection to collaborative editing, on some admins' userpages. Personally I think that we should only U5 non-self-promo autobios from new users when they're extraordinarily over-detailed, but appreciate I may be in the minority there... Here, though, this user has 37,000 global contributions to Wikimedia projects. I think they've earned a little navel-gazing. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 12:38, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Robert McClenon (talk) 01:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm growing ever more frustrated at U5, to the point I'm considering proposing its deprecation. U5 trifurcates into "covered by G10", "covered by G11", and "covered by telling the nom to stop ragpicking". Some time ago, I convinced a friend to register, and she was intrigued by the phenomenon of userboxes and added several of varying levels of seriousness to her user page; she didn't end up making other edits, but could well have. A few weeks ago, I saw her user page come up on my watchlist as deleted per U5. If she was ever going to make real edits before, she isn't now. We need to stop telling people to fuck off because their user pages don't look how the nominator would have formatted their own; this is true as ever when someone with tens of thousands of edits is getting the sharp end of the wedge. Vaticidalprophet 12:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A user page's purpose includes telling other editors a bit about yourself which is what this user page is doing. -- Whpq (talk) 02:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.