Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ENF - Embarrassed Nude Female/sandbox
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ƏXPLICIT 06:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Abandoned draft, no potential for ever becoming an article. Guy Macon (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not quite CSD#U5, as it conceivably could get into Plot device, but that article is not a list of all plot devices, and this is a very shallow one. I think you should have blanked it on discovery, as it is not worth having everyone here think about it. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - This has been abandoned for six-plus years by an editor who came and went six-plus years ago. The name of the account used by the editor is the same as the name of the plot device, which means that the account was created for the purpose of creating this draft, which means that the account was a sockpuppet account of someone. That isn't G5, but it is another reason to delete after this discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Clear U5, whatever the hell this is it needs to go. SK2242 (talk) 06:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is not TV Tropes. Has very little chance of becoming part of an encyclopaedia article. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 12:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- I actually searched TV Tropes before filing this, because the style is so close I thought it might be a simple cut and paste copyright infringement speedy delete. I Didn't find a smoking gun, but the copied page may have been deleted from TT years ago. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete — Clearly non-encyclopedic, get it out of here. — csc-1 21:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - One question - Just why ?...... Anywho doesn't improve the 'pedia in any way, shape or form. –Davey2010Talk 17:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.