Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kid Hurricane
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Images listed at IfD, as well - not GFDL, for sure. Daniel Bryant 09:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
It's a complete nonsense user page that masquerades as an article, and is apparently shared between multiple persons[1] (and I'm very tempted, although I haven't decided, to block all of them as abusive sockpuppets of each other). In any case, this is entirelly inappropriate (including defamation of Richard Nixon). Delete. --Nlu (talk) 12:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Why delete?
- Nixon was not a notable president, let them have their fun, who else is bothered reading it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.94.253.130 (talk • contribs).
- Using the page in this purpose is a direct violation of WP:USER. --Nlu (talk) 05:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a free web host. MER-C 08:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Total spam and violation of WP:NOT#WEBSPACE.Tellyaddict 16:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Do what you like to the page, I created it, I don't care. - Eoghan Moore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.94.253.130 (talk • contribs)
- It might be some crap band, who cares if it's real or not. - Patrick McGrane — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.94.253.130 (talk • contribs)
- Delete, WP:UP and weird sockoid goings-on. Sandstein 22:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Violation of webspace. Daniel5127 | Talk 00:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and close, Sockpuppetry galore.--WaltCip 02:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.