Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanbstevens/userboxes/Loving McDonald's food
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep. RL0919 (talk) 00:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of User:UBX/McDonald's, used only by one now-vanished user. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - no legitimate reason given for deletion, user inactive - not vanished. –xenotalk 18:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- "Duplicate of existing userbox" isn't a legit reason? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- No, I don't see that in the deletion policy. This one is stylistically different, and deletion does not save space. –xenotalk 19:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Does no harm. The way to save space on the server is to not have these unnecessary discussions. The way to improve Wikipedia is to work on dealing with actually harmful things--for example, trying to source the unsourced BLPs. ` DGG ( talk ) 15:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Userbox is harmless. Discussion about whether to delete it consumes more space than the userbox itself. --SJK (talk) 09:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Many people like McDonald's food. How is it that someone that creates a second userbox proclaming this is duplicating? MMS2013 12:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.