Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Billy Talent

Closing instructions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Billy Talent

Nearly untouched in its three years, never got off the ground. I see nothing to keep even for historical purposes. 8 of the 9 members have not edited in over a year or longer. The project never had a collaboration of the week, nor did anything of note ever go down on the talk page. If this is deleted, then {{BT-Project}}, Category:WikiProject Billy Talent and Category:WikiProject Billy Talent Templates can be deleted via G8. My main concern is that there's just nothing worth keeping here, really. None of the content of the talk page will be missed, as the only part that's even related to Billy Talent is one user saying how much he likes Billy Talent. The rest is an invitation from Esperanza, a buttload of red links to some dead project, etc. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 04:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - for the reasons so cogently outlined by the Hammer. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the remarks of the Hammer. John Carter (talk) 15:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as inactive; don't even bother marking with {{historical}}. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TPH. If there is ever renewed interest in having a group to collaborate on this topic, it may be more appropriate to create a task force of WikiProject Canadian music than an entirely separate WikiProject since the topic covers only about 40 articles. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 03:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedily delete. It'snot supposed to be there!--Ms dos mode (talk) 01:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.