Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikiclub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. ~ Riana ⁂ 16:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikiclub

This page is essentially content-free. However well-intentioned, its stated purpose is too vague to be useful in its current state. Suggest deletion as Wikipedia is neither a discussion forum nor a social networking site. --Muchness 19:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. What is this page about? A "club" to "improve Wikipedia"? That's far too vague to be of any use. Melsaran (talk) 21:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Author has a clear history of vandalism and disruptive page moves. ~~Could meet WP:CSD#G1~~. The project is not detailed as to its useful purpose, and there are no other edits or contributors after its creation (save for this MfD). - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 22:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you actually read WP:CSD#G1? It says "Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content". This page is not "patent nonsense". Melsaran (talk) 23:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content. Fits the description, IMO. But I may be wrong, that's why I only said "could". - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 07:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Patent nonsense is things like "rfjkseorfdkjhgfklhgf" or "the gnomes are walking in the sky. LOL". (see also Wikipedia:Patent nonsense). "This is a club to change things about Wikipedia" is not patent nonsense, even though it is far too vague. Melsaran (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - You're absolutely right. My argument was more towards the "no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever," but your argument that's its just to vague is much more appropriate. I admit I got a little carried away. - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 14:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Okay, no worries. I agree that the page doesn't really make sense (what is it about?), and support deleting it, but I just wanted to clarify that it isn't speediable under G1 :-) Melsaran (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, agreeing with Muchness' nomination statement. Sebi _[talk] 23:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, never really used for anything, and too vague for it to be used. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 05:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's already a club to improve Wikipedia. It's called you. Pursey ^{Talk | Contribs} 08:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is redundant: isn't improving Wikipedia what we're supposed to do anyway? Acalamari 19:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.