Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 April 23
April 23
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Adambro (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It took from YouTube, and somehow the video is a content is from BBC coverage, it doesn't make sense enough to that this image is really free enough --Aleenf1 06:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree - I took a photo of what's on my screen, and photoshoped it. It is an unique work of mine. Snapshot of TV screen/computer terminal is fair use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby fletcher (talk • contribs) 18:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The source for this image makes no mention of the creative commons license. BlueAzure (talk) 00:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No other images of the place are available. Peace. —MuzikJunky (talk) 08:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair use is not applicable to this image. The building is still being used, so a free image could be obtained. BlueAzure (talk) 02:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This image is a photograph of a Pokemon game that shows the trademarked Pokemon cards and graphics. It was listed at WP:CP but it doesn't really fall there because it's not an image downloaded from another site and uploaded here. It is, however, possibly a derivative work. KrakatoaKatie 00:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have edited the reasoning for the image use. Please look it over. It should now be satisfactory. Mathman1550 (talk) 03:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I would state (as the person that took the photo) that it is a fair use image featuring pokemon cards for the purposes of demonstrating what an example pokemon cardgame (and also as a logical follow-on p'mon cards) might look like. I don't think that the picture would give away any special (copyrighted?) gameplay mechanics or overstep the fair use boundaries by displaying too much detail in any card. I see that it shouldn't be a public domain image. I would be grateful if someone wants to edit the usage/permission tag and/or to replace the image with a lower resolution version. 1dragon (talk) 06:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kept. No worries here. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Does this mean we can remove the puic template from the articles containing this image? Mathman1550 (talk) 19:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Permission claimed, but no OTRS link. Kelly hi! 02:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of PD status. Kelly hi! 03:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for PD claim. Kelly hi! 03:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 03:45, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for public domain claim. Kelly hi! 03:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Works of Lawrence Livermore are not PD-Gov, the lab is run by a private firm on behalf of the government. Kelly hi! 03:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not PD, see WP:PD#German World War II images. Kelly hi! 04:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image not found at given source at ca Wikipedia, apparently deleted from there. No evidence for PD claim. Kelly hi! 04:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for PD claim. Kelly hi! 04:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Permission claimed, but no OTRS link. Kelly hi! 04:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for PD claim. Kelly hi! 04:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for public domain claim. Kelly hi! 04:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Luk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}}. Presumably the first two versions are GFDL licensed; Montrealais says he took them himself. However, the most recent version, uploaded by Ettml, gives a Flickr page as its source [1], and this Flickr page says, "All rights reserved". There is no evidence on the Flickr page that this photo has been licensed under the GFDL, or any free license for that matter. It seems that Ettml just uploaded a different photo but neglected to change any of the existing information on the image description page. Now, the Flickr user who took this picture is also called ettml [2], so it is likely that the Ettml who uploaded the latest version really is the photographer; but the problem still remains that this image doesn't seem to have ever been explicitly released under a free license. —Bkell (talk) 04:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- GFDL image restored. -Nv8200p talk 22:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Permission claimed but no OTRS link. Kelly hi! 04:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I emailed the ebay advertiser and he agreed to the use of this image which is why I "claim" permission - whatever an "OTRS link" is, I'm pretty sure I don't have one. So delete it for all I care, or print out a copy and shove it up your ass.Trewornan (talk) 19:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Permission claimed, but no OTRS link. Kelly hi! 05:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for PD claim. Kelly hi! 05:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for public domain claim. Kelly hi! 05:45, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence to support public domain claim. Kelly hi! 05:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence to support public domain claim. Kelly hi! 05:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence for PD claim. Kelly hi! 06:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User:Dylant07 has uploaded several copyright images as can be seen here. Although I couldn't find this one I believe it too is a copyright violation. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC) CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User:Dylant07 has uploaded several copyright images as can be seen here. Although I couldn't find this one I believe it too is a copyright violation. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC) CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Gwen Gale (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User:Dylant07 has uploaded several copyright images as can be seen here. Although I couldn't find this one I believe it too is a copyright violation. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC) CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.