Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 October 14
< October 13 | October 15 > |
---|
October 14
[edit]Claims to be self-made, however the image can also be found at http://www.hinduofuniverse.com/hinglaj-yatra.html and http://pakistaniat.com/2007/03/02/mud-volcanoes-volcano-balochistan-baluchistan-hingol-offroad-makran-pasni-hinglaj/ . The uploader has also violated copyright in articles by plagiarising http://www.pakistanpaedia.com/parks/hingol/national_parks_of_pakistan-hingol.html into the article on the Hingol River and the Hingol National Park. The uploader is now a banned user. Matilda talk 22:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Inactive user many of whose uploads have already been deleted as copyvio. I followed a deletion request from Commons over here. Cleanup on remaining non-free images. DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Claims to be self-made. Television broadcast caption visible at bottom. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Editor claims to be copyright holder. Television logo "Pyramid" visible at right. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Editor claims to be copyright holder. Television logo "Pyramid" visible at right. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Editor claims to be copyright holder. Television logo "Pyramid" visible at right. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Editor claims to be copyright holder. Television logo "Pyramid" visible at right. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Editor claims to be copyright holder. Television logo "Pyramid" visible at right. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Portrait of Bill Clinton clearly taken from a television screen. Uploader claims to be copyright owner. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be copyright holder, but no camera metadata. Unused image. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be copyright holder, but no camera metadata. Dubious claim of ownership for what appears to be a historic press conference photograph of a public figure. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be copyright holder, but no camera metadata. Unused image. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused image. — DurovaCharge! 08:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution image, no meta-data, no explicit source information. I suspect this was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 16:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution image, no meta-data, no explicit sourcing details. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 16:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution image, no meta-data, no explicit sourcing details. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 16:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution image, no meta-data, no explicit sourcing. I suspect this was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 16:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Source website says nothing about this image being GFDL, and I doubt they have the rights to license what appears to be a fairly old image. J Milburn (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution, no meta-data, no explicit sourcing information. I suspect this was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 17:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution image, no meta-data, no explicit source information. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 17:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution, no meta-data, no explicit source information. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 17:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution, no meta-data, no explicit source information. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 17:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Low resolution image, no meta-data, no explicit source info, looks posed. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 17:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- IFF this image is nonfree, could it be considered fair use on account of the low resolution (less than 150px*105px)? The image does add to the article - is there a verifiably free alternative? 219.89.151.147 (talk) 10:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- This image is widely available on the internet including livenirvana.com
Dont erase its a cool rare picture!
Leave it!!!
Low resolution image, no meta-data, no explicit source info. Uploader has uploaded other suspicious images. I doubt they own the rights to this. J Milburn (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- IFF this image is nonfree, could it be considered fair use on account of the low resolution (less than 150px*105px)? The image does add to the article - is there a verifiably free alternative? 219.89.151.147 (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Image:96756772a6181218158l.jpg right above it at Krist Novoselic seems like a decent free alternative to me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- This image is free from Flikr http://www.flickr.com/photos/angelaofthemorning/25345479/
- It says "All rights reserved"...that's not compatible with this Wiki. Louis Waweru Talk 22:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- This image is free from Flikr http://www.flickr.com/photos/angelaofthemorning/25345479/
- Image:96756772a6181218158l.jpg right above it at Krist Novoselic seems like a decent free alternative to me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)