Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 25
July 25
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Poster , Skeptical as to -'self' claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete orphaned professional quality publicity-style image claimed as copyright of the uploader is found all over the internet by tineye. Likely an Apple image but has no permission to use. ww2censor (talk) 04:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a modified version of a (copyrighted) Google Maps image from here. Allstar86 (talk) 07:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Skeptical about a self claim - There's evidence of possible half-toning in the image suggesting a magazine or book scan. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep . Garion96 (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Packagaing artwork.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Those are pretty simple designs. I would say that Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc. applies here. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Executive summation being ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure I follow your question. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What was the decision in the case you mention in 2 lines? (i'm Assuming simple packaging isn't (C) issue if included in a larger work?) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Threshold of originality should explain it. s:Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc. held that a design of a simple utilitarian item, in this case a bottle, was not, of itself, copyrightable; nor was a label that had various information about the product. Stifle (talk) 11:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What was the decision in the case you mention in 2 lines? (i'm Assuming simple packaging isn't (C) issue if included in a larger work?) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure I follow your question. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Executive summation being ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am inclined to keep this, as the packaging/labels don't pass the threshold of originality. Stifle (talk) 11:23, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept wrong forum (I updated license as well). Skier Dude (talk) 06:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Web screenshot - No indication uploader is copyright holder Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G12 by Closedmouth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Source listed states - "This site (c) 2009 - www.ferret-hammock.com" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Although this is art, there's no infromation as to the original artist, or whether they allowed reproductions. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Name of the artist does nor occur on the painitng, which is being prserved by his daughter. None knows the name of the artist. I shot the photograph. It is essentially since there is no indication that it is not unfree. This photo has been used in different books and maf#gazines without any credit to the artist.Noorelahi (talk) 14:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, Sorry.. HOW Can something clearly marked (C) Google be self? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Woody (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Montage - No indication of indvidual image sources. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by The JPS (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Skeptical of self claim - Tineye gave a number of hits for this image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept - dates appear to be ok Skier Dude (talk) 06:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No FOP in Italy, How old is the statue? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The article says it is attributed to Antonio Canova, who died in 1822. I think we are ok. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The top and bottom images of this montage aren't under free licenses, only the middle two are. Polly (Parrot) 18:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Source information on the top and bottom images might be found on the pages of deleted files File:Cincinnati Skyline Cincin 48a38f70d3740.jpg and File:Duke energy.jpg. —teb728 t c 04:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It is, and it says they're fair use. This image is history. Stifle (talk) 11:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright notice on the image would seem to indicate that the uploader isn't the copyright holder. Polly (Parrot) 19:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image likely sourced from a website, no evidence uploader holds copyright. Polly (Parrot) 19:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image obviously sourced from a website, uploader isn't the copyright holder. Polly (Parrot) 20:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image obviously sourced from a website like all this other uploaders copyvios. Polly (Parrot) 20:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional tour poster, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 21:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A promotional image, no evidence the uploader holds the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 21:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The photographer is Emin Kuliyev gave promotional rights to Michelle Walker for the images resulting from the photo shoot he did in 2007. He can be contacted - (718) 828-2451 - website http://www.em34.com/ email: emin_resume2@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smilesong (talk • contribs) 14:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The permission needs to be sent through to permissions-en@wikimedia.org; we are not going to contact him for you. Stifle (talk) 11:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Although there is a claim that there is a free permission - I can't currently find it !! Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- From what I can see, the source web page giving distribution permission is here: [1]. Don't know whether this permission is legally explicit enough for Wikipedia to keep the image. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 00:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Worth asking someone to point the museum at OTRS? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; "please distribute freely" seems free to me. Stifle (talk) 11:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Distribute freely is not free enough. No mention if derivative works are possible. Garion96 (talk) 19:58, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.