Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 9

< May 8	May 10 >

May 9

I still want this photo up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.216.150 (talk) 00:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modern Ghana.Hasanuzzaman Shemul.jpg

Logo of newspaper/website. Uploader released into PD but is unlikely to be copyright holder. Radiant chains (talk) 09:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Ghana

I have full permission to use File:Modern Ghana.Hasanuzzaman Shemul.jpg or others any information from Modern Ghana for wikipedia article Modern Ghana.

(From:"editor" <editor@modernghana.com>

To:hatashe9009@yahoo.com

Saturday, May 9, 2009 2:49 AM

Dear Hasanuzzaman Talukdar SHEMUL,

Thanks so much for creating a profiile in Wikipedia for modernghana.com we are very happy for that help. I have just made changes to the owners we are only two bright and me , i would have been happy if you could manage it for us and ask for any information which could help you complete it, i would be happy to feed you with it

Roger

General Manager.)

Hasanuzzaman T Shemul (talk) 14:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't have a free license release and would need to be sent into OTRS in any case. Stifle (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fau-uniforms.jpg

This is one of a batch of images by a contributor who has had some difficulties with copyright, including two images speedily deleted within the last several days for blatant infringement. This is connected to a currently open ticket at ANI; see [1]. This contributor is unlikely to own the copyright to the schemata for the uniforms of this team. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other images for which I ask evaluation here include File:FAU Charles Pierre vs UAB.jpg, File:Fau vs msu 2008.jpg, File:Howard-Schnellenberger-2008.jpg, File:Robbie Widlansky.jpg, File:FAU Polo v Minnesota 07.jpg, File:Woodson FAU v Kentucky 2007.jpg, File:FAU vs USF 2007.jpg, File:FAU Slippery Rock.jpg and File:Rusty-smith-football-player.jpg. Given what seems to be blatant copyright infringement and lack of metadata, origin of these images may be suspect. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Get a life. All of these images are my property that I wish to share on Wikipedia. Go ahead and delete every picture... I really don't care. Wikipedia will be left with no pictures when you get done with it. I thought I could contribute to Wikipedia. Remove the stick.....Yezn0r (talk) 20:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I listed them here rather than speedily deleting them when deleting the evidently blatant infringements was to give you an opportunity to verify if these images are your property. If you are authorized to license the uniform design of this team to Wikipedia, then please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the process. We welcome all contributions to the project that conform to guidelines and United States law. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:20, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All Mostly because of the user's personal attack. Additionally because of previous now deleted copyvios the user has uploaded AND most of these files include unfree logos. Nice mouse pointer on File:FAU Charles Pierre vs UAB.jpg. File:Fau vs msu 2008.jpg is a copyvio owned by Grand Rapids Press and used to be here. File:Howard-Schnellenberger-2008.jpg is a copyvio owned by the Sun Sentinel and is found here. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 08:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alchemy Sulfur Symbol used by Satanists.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kept. Stifle (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I find the uploader's claim to have created this image entirely by themselves unlikely: essentially identical versions can be found e.g. here and here. The symbol might count as {{PD-ineligible}}, though. Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly {{PD-ineligible}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's absolutely no copyright for the alchemy symbol, that existed hundreds of years before Anton Lavey decided to use it in the satanic bible. It's even documented that many alchemists were themselves satanists that practiced black magic, so that rules out Lavey being the first satanist to use it. The links that you provided show copies of the actual cross that Lavey placed above the nine satanic statements. The image in question was made to resemble that cross, so yes, it is essentially the same. I've uploaded the original version to make everyone happy, and to end this dispute. --Tacosunday (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to {{PD-ineligible}}, so it's kosher. --Tacosunday (talk) 04:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pensummermap03.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image in question clearly comes from the government of Wisconsin, not the USA as the tag suggests. Because of this the image is not PD-USgov Marcusmax(speak) 18:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect copyright tag. Per source website "The material is for the noncommercial use of the general public."[2]; noncommercial only not considred free licensed per Wikimedia. Delete. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:55, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Freedomcenter.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any evidence of free license at the Omaha World-Herald front page and copyright notice at http://www.omaha.com/ . Indeed there is a clear copyright notice as well as text restating in detail that everything there is subject to copyright. Some confirmation or link to evidence of free needed. Infrogmation (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cruzella0817ph2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NrDg (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Found at http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c380/jesicazurc06/DSC_7784.jpg with author jesicazurc. Uploader claims he is author but has different name than photobucket name. No EXIF on uploaded image. Photo taken with Nikon D2X which is a pro camera. Unlikely a pro would release his images under a PD license. NrDg 20:51, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:75años.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Ruuta 25, who has a history of uploading copyvio images. No metadata either, and could conceivably have been replaced by someone who took a free image at the ceremony. Blueboy 96 23:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.