Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 November 16
November 16
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Clive Burgess.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- OR, photoshopped photo (no source) & logo (no source) Skier Dude (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Black & White image is shown as This photograph is the copyright © of George Herringshaw & sporting-heroes.net at http://www.sporting-heroes.net/rugby-heroes/displayhero.asp?HeroID=5707 MilborneOne (talk) 21:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ebbw vale badge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- OR sports logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- When the same user uploaded it as File:Ebbw vale rfc badge.jpg he/she declared it as a non-free logo from http://www.ebbwvalerfc.co.uk/ When they uploaded it as File:Ebbw vale rfc badge 2.jpg they decided it was still a non-free logo with a rationale. As this is a unused duplicate it should just be deleted. MilborneOne (talk) 22:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:A Cover Rwanda.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Book cover; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Book cover; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:A Poisonous Mineral.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Art of David Baldwin (baseball) - no link between artist & uploader Skier Dude (talk) 02:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:A Strumpet's Fool.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- artwork of Dave Baldwin (baseball), no link between uploader & artist Skier Dude (talk) 02:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- promotional materials for Scientists for Global Responsibility, no OTRS, unlikely released as CC3.0 Skier Dude (talk) 02:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Furst fruts uvl 977.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Book cover; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- CD cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Book cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Book cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- photo or artwork/text in book, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Space Opera book 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- photo or artwork/text in book, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ssf6+Processural.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- book covers, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Positive future.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- promotional materials for Scientists for Global Responsibility, no OTRS, unlikely released as CC3.0 Skier Dude (talk) 02:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Vis assc cat. cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Book cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Converted to fair use with rationale and downsized. Shell babelfish 17:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- magazine cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cover Bauern.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Book cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BauernamBerg cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Book cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AfriqueNoire cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Book cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission but appears to be logo from official website so converted to fair use with rationale. Shell babelfish 17:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ACTSA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- corporate logo; unlikely is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gokada.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Given the watermark it's a screencap from youtube - no source - unable to determine (c) Skier Dude (talk) 02:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Avekingdom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- collage of 14 pictures - no sources provided for any of them Skier Dude (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Walkingseries.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- DVD cover; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GKGs4.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Given the watermark it's a screencap from youtube - no source - unable to determine (c) Skier Dude (talk) 02:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission but does appear to be official logo, changed to fair use with rationale. Shell babelfish 17:31, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Goldfields giants.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 02:54, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Good old days 013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Given blur & pixelation - appears to be screenshot; no source Skier Dude (talk) 03:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- film festival logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence of permission and appears to be marketing material rather than official logo. Shell babelfish 17:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- film festival logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission so changed to fair use. Shell babelfish 17:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission but does appear to be official logo; changed to fair use. Tagged identical image on Commons also missing permission. Shell babelfish 17:44, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PureCircle logo.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Screaming For More.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be DVD cover but too small to be 100% sure; if so , uploader most likely not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sdfs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- OR, school logo, dead links; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Seahavenlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- OR, sports team logo, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by IronGargoyle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR civic logo, no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just delete it. It is no longer official. — ASDFGH =] talk? 03:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission, changed to fair use. Shell babelfish 17:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:B-XDM-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Book cover, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result was obviously non-free, and claimed as such, therefore this is the incorrect venue. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:B.G.-THOTSV1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- album cover, no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission, changed to fair use. Shell babelfish 17:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:B.G.-THOTSV2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- album cover, no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission, changed to fair use. Shell babelfish 18:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:B.G.-livinlegend.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- album cover, no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence of permission, could be fair use except current article is little more than a song list.Shell babelfish 18:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Viatanoastra1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- album cover, no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission so changed to fair use. Shell babelfish 19:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- album cover, no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence of permission, could have been fair use, but the article is little more than a song list. Shell babelfish 20:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- album cover, no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- album cover, no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence of permission and unable to verify that this is an official logo. Shell babelfish 20:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BCSD Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- School logo; no source; if legit, user would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BEST WWWemblem.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- OR corporate logo; no source; if legit, user would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. No evidence of permission but does appear to be official logo; changed to fair use. Shell babelfish 20:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BES logo small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- School logo; no source; if legit, user would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence of permission and only discussed briefly in article about author so unlikely to be fair use. Shell babelfish 20:31, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- journal cover, no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Post-logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- OR corporate logo; no source; if legit, user would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Poster slumdog.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- event poster; no source; if legit, user would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SergeAntoine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "from a video" but doesn't identify the actual copyright holder. Taking a picture of your TV doesn't make the image yours. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence of permission.
- File:JohnSkelt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Field-level action shot from a sporting event; likely from some media outlet or another. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:16, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The uploader has responded on the File talk page. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action. Image is listed as fair use. Shell babelfish 20:43, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Geocities source path is no longer valid. - Still fair use ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yahoo Inc. closed all free GeoCities websites on Oct. 26, 2009. All images with source path there are affected. The picture discussed here was uploaded to Wikimedia on Dec. 31, 2007. Since that time it repeatedly survived many deletion attempts as it is under strict scrutiny while used in very frequented Wikipedia article about the death of John Lennon.--Bluewind (talk) 16:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Still locatable at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://geocities.com/SouthBeach/Keys/6624/SHOOT.JPG Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There should be provided at least one new reason for deletion of this image - because the reason provided by user Sfan00 IMG was sufficiently refuted by user Skier Dude. --Bluewind (talk) 23:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Connie Dungs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unverifable source path - Fair use if can be identified as album cover. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Already deleted: 20:15, December 19, 2009 Fastily Shell babelfish 20:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:T3-EPE2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unverfiable source path. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Geocities, RIP... History can be found at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://geocities.com/asiaglobe/gallery/ Skier Dude (talk) 07:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.