Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 May 2
May 2
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BlakeIanWriting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Taken from his website, http://blakeian.com/flash/ (see "photos" tab, no direct link because it's flash-based). • ɔ ʃ → 02:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Runway.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possibly not the work of the uploader, version without overlay text http://cityphilippines.com/ThePhilippines/LegazpiCity/Region5_LegazpiCity_LegazpiCityAirport.jpg date November 2005 pre-dates wikipedia upload MilborneOne (talk) 16:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; solution offered. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Handson tangrams.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly video game cover Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. File licensed under fair use now. — ξxplicit 19:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, appropriately tagged now. • ɔ ʃ → 21:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tuareg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Really doubtful that the uploader, who has been blocked indefinitely, owns the copyright to this image. — ξxplicit 19:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Handson screenshot1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Non-free screenshot. — ξxplicit 19:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jesse james jason lee falcon motorcycles amaryllis knight ian barry bullet falcon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Licence on Flickr is incompatible with Wikipedia. Licence is CC-BY-NC-ND and therefore the image should be deleted. Biker Biker (talk) 20:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I can see no evidence of where the licence for this file was obtained. There is another Falcon motorcycles image (File:Bullet falcon motorcycle drive side.jpg) but that has OTRS verified permission. I believe this file should be deleted. Biker Biker (talk) 20:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rustaveli Theatre.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image says (c) on it. • ɔ ʃ → 21:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dave-moyer-headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Professional headshot seemingly not photographed by Moyer; doesn't have permission to license the photo. Blurpeace 21:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Twenty20cuplogo2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Almost certainly not the work of the uploader. A quick search turned up this higher resolution version of the image. In the higher-res version you can see that the "smudge" arround the upper left corner of the logo in File:Twenty20cuplogo2.png is actually the words "© 2003 ECB TM". I suppose its theoretically possible that the original uploader did, in fact, create the image and has obtained ECB's permission to CC license it, but I highly doubt it. —RP88 23:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well why don't we just change it to fair use, take out the dubious claim and just put non-free logo template? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm afraid I don't know enough about the subject to write a reasonable fair use rationale (particularly since I'm not sure how well the image in question identifies the subject since it doesn't seem to currently be in use on the subject's web site), but if you or one of the contributors to the Twenty20 Cup article wants to make the change, I certainly have no objections. —RP88 13:36, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.