Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 September 4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
September 4
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jaqueline Carvalho.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The photo is very good but it seems that it is also on http://www.nickvanderleek.com/2012/08/jaqueline-carvalho-brazils-beautiful.html and to be sure we would like a mail from nickvanderleek.com confirming that the license is correct. MGA73 (talk) 06:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep with addition of fair-use rationale. Dianna (talk) 03:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Torrioj.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a photograph of Johnny Torrio, who died in 1957. No evidence is provided that this photograph was published before 1923 as claimed. —Bkell (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Masked Kane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Lacking rationale; from 404 link appears to have originated as a YouTube screen capture. Papacha (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The EXIF is similar to File:Field Station Dinosaurs Opening May 25 2012.jpeg which I tagged as a copyright violation, so I would guess that this also is a copyright violation. Also note the text in the EXIF: "Copyright holder: 2012 Yasmeen Anderson Photography" Stefan2 (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pain pathaways prialt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image has no author and the source is a website that is no longer in existence. Image has boarder and shadow as if it were taken from a website or publication. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image lists "MURAT TUZER" as source and creator. Not known if uploader is this person. Images look very similar to the ones taken on http://www.skysports-turkey.com/#/photograph multiple other images have of uploader have been deleted due to inappropriate source or information -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image lists "MURAT TUZER" as source and creator. Not known if uploader is this person. Images look very similar to the ones taken on http://www.skysports-turkey.com/#/photograph multiple other images have of uploader have been deleted due to inappropriate source or information -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ptps100.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image looks to be a low quality scan from another document, not owned by uploader -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Some sort of low quality colour image - probably a newspaper. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; image has been scanned from a book, but no source information was provided. Dianna (talk) 03:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is a black and white that looks to be a scan of another image (see edges round bottom and right with shadow). Image is from 1948 and was uploaded in 2008. Dubious original photo is owned by uploader. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Renault type MT recing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is a low quality image. Could possibly be a screenshot or a scan of another image. Most likely original work not owned by uploader -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rhartlogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is an logo for the Rick Hart company which is now longer in existance: see http://www.rickhart.com.au/ logo rights are not owned by uploader -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Robwegner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image is a photo of Rob Wegner and is used all over the Outreach Magazine's website when his articles are published. (eg http://www.outreachmagazine.com/features/4520-Stories-Missional-Real-Life.html) most likely image is owned by Outreach Magazine. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.