Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 14

< April 13	April 15 >

April 14

File:P1010762-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:P1010762-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Flickr version of image[1] tagged as noncommercial. Kelly ^hi! 02:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Spike lee1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spike lee1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a letter, so can't be own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Logonew.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logonew.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Clearly a logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alltex EPZ Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alltex EPZ Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Clearly a corporate logo, Convert to fair use? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No-email received Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resent email: Brief - User has obtained verbal approval from company - what proof do I need to submit to Wikipedia - an email confirmation from the respective company? Thanks NGayanP

Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is File:Alltex EPZ Logo.jpg.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dissect-medicine-screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dissect-medicine-screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Screencap. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Oyster card back.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oyster card back.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Rear of oyster card, whose design is nominally owned by TfL Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SANPLogo.svg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 21:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SANPLogo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a derivative work of a copyrighted logo, and so the creator cannot put into public domain.Wgunther (talk) 17:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Obama MentoringAd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Obama MentoringAd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

A PUF relisting was suggested with this edit by King of Hearts on DR. In this case, it's perfectly reasonable to believe, even expect that the person in charge of the project would have copyright authority over its product. I think we should believe a user who claims to be and pretty clearly is (look at his edits) Associate Dean at the Harvard School of Public Health when he claims he created the content and clearly, at a minimum, spearheaded their creation. All the deleted files at http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&action=view&user=Prof756 should be restored. I detect copyright paranoia. --Elvey (talk) 18:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See User_talk:Stefan2#Overruling_King_of_Hearts_advice_-_why.3F.

You can't tag a PUF discussion with {{bots|deny=AnomieBOT}}. WP:PUF is for discussions about files which exist. It's impossible to tell whether this image is free or not since it is currently deleted. Try to get someone to undelete it during the PUF discussion. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say Try to get someone to undelete it during the PUF discussion. You hadn't noticed that AnomieBOT was preventing that discussion by closing it? Please. You say impossible. People can still look at the images at their source; see prior discussions.--Elvey (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given the lack of OTRS email for the alleged AP content, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_September_10, I take back my nomination, because I assum claim of AP content to be valid. I've marked the file for speedy deletion, so AnomieBOT should close this shortly.--Elvey (talk) 02:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

was something over sighted here? The only recent image I see is the placeholder. --B (talk) 12:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I didn't read. Deleting. --B (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Turk Broda.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turk Broda.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This wasn't published before 1946, so it is protected by copyright in the United States for 95 years since publication. Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bbattery1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bbattery1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Stefan2 (talk) 18:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1948 Hatzic Pumphouse Breach.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:1948 Hatzic Pumphouse Breach.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Not taken before 1946, so protected by copyright for 95 years since publication in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 18:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Queen of the Hurricanes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as PD-US-not renewed. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen of the Hurricanes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence that the artist died before 1963 as required by Canadian rules or before 1946 as required by US rules. Stefan2 (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This Canadian work is in the public domain in Canada because its copyright has expired for one of the following reasons:

it was subject to Crown copyright and was first published before 1963, it was a photograph created before 1949, it was a photograph that was created after 1948 — but before 1962 — and the copyright was owned by a corporation, it was an unpublished work created by an author who died before 1949, it was otherwise a work created by an author who died before 1963 (subject to transitional rules for unpublished works by authors who died after 1948 but before 1999), where the creator is unknown, the work was published before 1963 or (if not published) created before 1938.

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Unknown" doesn't mean that the creator isn't named in the comic book but that the name of the creator isn't revealed within 50 years from publication. This page tells that the creators of several of the stories have been identified although I believe that no one was named in the comic book. No identified creator is listed for this particular story, so maybe that means that the creator is unknown, and it is unclear if those other names were identified during the first 50 years after publication or if they were first identified at a later point.

Additionally, the source country isn't Canada but the United States as True Comics was a US publication. I can't find True Comics in the copyright renewal records for 1970, so I suppose it's {{PD-US-not renewed}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:17, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a copy of the comic. There is no author/illustrator identified. The original file was actually found at the Canada National Public Archives, even though there is no doubt that it was originally a long defunct U.S. publication. I had checked with the biographer of the engineer that was the subject of the comic book profile and he assured me that the material was in the public domain in both the U.S. and Canada. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Remco Tanker and Delivery Van.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Remco Tanker and Delivery Van.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Derivative image of models - commons:com:TOYS Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of models themselves are not copyright infringement. You cannot easily have articles on model types without showing examples. Wikipedia commons is full of pictures of model cars that are arranged by the photographer and are not copyrighted.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 03:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Derivative work of toys. The kind of images that you are talking about are frequently deleted from Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TCL Chapel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TCL Chapel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Something is fishy here. The uploader claims that he took the photo in 2009, but the EXIF tells that it was taken in 2006, and there is a low-quality copy of it at http://www.tclsl.org/Chapel.html Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sscrolcb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sscrolcb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unclear if the uploader knows what "self-made" means. The term appears on logos (Special:PermanentLink/193272028) and obvious copyvios (File:Fort San Felipe.jpg), and the visual effects look suspiciously promotional in nature. I suspect that this was stolen from the schools website or something. Stefan2 (talk) 23:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Canacaofacade.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canacaofacade.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious own work, see immediately above. Stefan2 (talk) 23:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Karslakedavidseye.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karslakedavidseye.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I can't find anything directly online, but the author is listed as Paul Karslake, who is still alive. Uploader has used a PD-author copyright tag. ALH (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lobster21.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lobster21.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source and author are just listed as Theo Jones. The date given is only the upload date. Uploader has used a PD-author copyright tag. ALH (talk) 23:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.