Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 March 28
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
March 28
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Own work doubtful, seems to be a scan (at least right half) :Jay8gInspect-Berate-Know WASH-BRIDGE-WPWA-MFIC 03:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:15, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Clooney-favorite.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 05:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Copyvio from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/3192930.stm --Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GrbJPG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Threshold of originality concern, given this is a logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Posh0987posh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 15:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Marked "© EMPICS" here. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted and replaced with File:Jyothy Kendriya Vidyalaya logo.png Dianna (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JkvLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Commons:COM:FOP#India doesn't apply to 2D works such as logos. Would be OK as fair use, but a better copy of the logo could maybe be found to replace this one. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No reason for the public domain claim given. Indian photos are only in the public domain in the United States if they were published before 1941. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The owner of the photograph has given permission for its use, and has no objection to its use in the wiki article. Leo68 04:35, 2 April 2013 (UTC)leo68
- Permission needs to come from the photographer, not from the owner of the physical photo. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; copyright is implied. Dianna (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a bit more that "simple geometric shapes". Eeekster (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- No copyright restrictions or limitation are indicated on the cover or inside the journal on the use of the cover of the Journal.Leo68 04:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)leo68
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Braindead-Jen-Jen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a screencap. Kelly hi! 22:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- See also http://www.amazon.com/dp/0971997713 (same image, different crop). --Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jim Clark Lotus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- appears to be a duplicate of http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/scottish-racing-driver-jim-clark-at-the-dutch-grand-prix-news-photo/3065185 Mighty Antar (talk) 22:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Consider using {{db-f9}} for cases like this. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.