Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 10
| < October 9 | October 11 > |
|---|
October 10
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn --Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Great Shamokin Path.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Great Shamokin Path.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 09:01, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep because of the link that User:GrapedApe gave at Commons a couple of hours after this PUF was filed. A marker with precisely the same text (but without a copyright notice) was placed in 1950, so the original text is {{PD-US-no notice}}, and the marker shown in this image is simply reusing text that's already in the public domain. Nyttend (talk) 13:26, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- By the way: Stefan2, would you mind if I just close this PUF now, since you say at Commons "this should solve it"? Nyttend (talk) 13:27, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Gabriel Hauser.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The same photo also appeared at http://pediatrics.georgetown.edu/attendings/picu/hauser/ so we need OTRS to verify the permission. Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs). File was subsequently reuploaded properly as fair use. NAC. — Train2104 (talk • contribs)
- File:Oh My Pyo Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- If this really was designed by the uploader, I believe the copyright would be held by the releasing studio. I also doubt this was uploaded by the creator, but that's not something we can prove 100%. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Rizoupoli Stadium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Potential copyright violation. Also appears here but in slightly different resolution. Stefan2 (talk) 17:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Pae kerkyra.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says that the uploader took a photo with his mobile phone, so this is a derivative work. Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Cycle tactile pavement, tactile pavement survey, 28-1-05.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image comes from a pdf document. Uploader states that because page 2 says available to the public that the file is released into the public domain. The same page states ©Crown Copyright (2005). I don't have a great amount of knowledge on the Crown Copyright, but its obviously copywritten and not released into the public domain. A document being available to the public is not the same as being released in the public domain. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:21, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.