Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Forkattack
[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Forkattack|action=edit}} Vote here] (0/2/0) ending 02:20, Tomorrow (UTC)
Forkattack (talk · contribs) – I am a good Wikipedia user with a few edits, none of which have been vandalism. Please make me an admin it would make my task easier. Forkattack 02:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Accepted
Support
Forkattack 02:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)(Can't vote for yourself. —Cuiviénen, Friday, 24 March 2006 @ 02:28 (UTC))
Oppose
- Oppose - Thirteen edits, of which 3 were to this page. Enough said. Become a serious and long term contributor. —Cuiviénen, Friday, 24 March 2006 @ 02:28 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - I don't think this user has anywhere near enough experience yet (tiny edit count), and I'm not convinced by his standard of etiquette... answers to the questions seem rather hostile. Has also partaken in dubious editing... created strange redirect page: A dingo ate my baby redirecting to Azaria_Chamberlain_disappearance, poor use of edit summaries, very confrontational talk page usage etc... - Papa November 16:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A. Deleting pages, of course. And banning idiots.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. Alphabetizing the SP page, and laughing at people on Talk: The Darkest Faerie.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A. No.